1404
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 95 points 6 months ago

Anyone remember when he spent all his time talking about colonising mars? That was his big thing and the future. Whatever happened to that?

Then spacex got government funding. Now AI is the big thing.

I've still yet to see any of his great visions he's actually delivered on.

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 73 points 6 months ago

Whatever happened to that?

He took all the money he was going to use to do that, put it in a duffelbag with X written on the side, and burned it.

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Isn't something like that why Elon got in trouble with the Tesla board? Something about using Tesla as a bank to fund space x.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 8 points 6 months ago

Space X which he owns a controlling stake in, unlike Tesla.

[-] nytrixus@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

He's one of those people who'll pop around a corner and proclaim his credit of something he had next to no involvement in.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Notice he has never actually volunteered to go up in a SpaceX rocket. I don't think he'll be going to Mars.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 months ago

Tis a shame, Musk would be perfect to colonize Mars. Send him there. But forget to send women.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I can think of some women who could go with him. Elizabeth Holmes, for example.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Can we send Marjorie Taylor Greene, too? I really think they'd hit it off and I'd really like for her to be marooned, too.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

See? I'm sure we can make up a list of women we can also send on the ~~submarine down to the Titanic~~ rocket to Mars.

[-] kungen@feddit.nu 2 points 6 months ago

Why should wire fraud give such a harsh punishment?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

I sincerely hope this is sarcasm. Either that, or you are completely unaware of how the American justice system favors the wealthy.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

SpaceX is a fucking trashfire too. The fact that NASA has contracts with them disturbs me greatly.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Whatever happened to that?

Very much in progress if you follow news on Starship. Actually going too fast in my opinion, I don't think it's safe enough.

[-] epat@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

On the other hand, Starship is not fast enough, if I recall correctly, SpaceX claimed to Nasa that they'd be landing on the moon by now

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

They definitely have their setbacks and delays. They sure keep trying though.

[-] epat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

They do, but being slower than Orion to even get to the orbit is not a great look

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

The question was "what happened to that?", and the answer is "it's very actively happening". Whether they actually succeed is a whole different question that I can't answer, but I wouldn't bet on it.

[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Starship is a terrible idea and vehicle. The fact they keep trying to make the thing work is just because Musk is burning government funds. It has no chance of making it to the moon, let alone mars.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It sure is questionable, but so far each test got further than the last one, so while I wouldn't be making any bets on it working, I'm not going to discount it either. People said the same thing about reusable rockets and now it's no big deal. They might have a chance, as long as the president of SpaceX manages to keep Musk away from it.

[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Anything can make progress if it's within the realm of possibility and you throw enough resources at it.

My issue with Starship is that it's not really good for any of the things Musk has promised it for. It's a heavy lift rocket that has not yet proven capable of surviving flight. Best case it can be used to get materials up to space, but used as a lander or a long distance ship? No way. It's just not designed that way. Too heavy, too unsafe, too inefficient, too complicated.

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Sure, it's a reasonable take.

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
1404 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59419 readers
2928 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS