82
submitted 6 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's not that few have heard about it, per se.

It's more that there's an intense disinformation and misinformation campaign about it. Run largely by people who should be celebrating the victories that have been made, but who instead just handwave away all progress as insufficient. Because they really, really, really hate Biden, and so accepting that he's good on an issue (which he just plain is on climate) is not compatible with their worldviews.

You'll see it in this thread just as assuredly as anywhere.

Where yo WON'T hear it is among policy wonks. The IRA is celebrated in serious climate circles. Just listen to, say, David Roberts (http://volts.wtf), for example, and you can barely get through any segment without talking about how much it has unlocked renewable spending/expansion.

And it's not the endgame, it's just the first step along a new path. It's even built into the law that it will make further efforts politically and financially easier.

Meanwhile, people who claim they care deeply about climate don't even know what the IRA is. I'm not one to gatekeep, but it really does show how shallow climate reporting in the greater media landscape is.

The irony is, refusing to see how much progress has been made on climate under Biden may condemn us to lose it all when Trump gets reelected as a result and follows through on his promises to reverse courses on green energy in all its forms and vastly scale up drilling and LNG. Because Trump would potentially be able to cripple the act and the institutions it created even without control of congress.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 6 months ago

From one Admiral to another: well said.

this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
82 points (94.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5244 readers
355 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS