-16
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] realcaseyrollins@noauthority.social -3 points 4 months ago

@Atelopus-zeteki @OnlyTakesLs @BobaFuttbucker So, are you guys saying that the info in the article is false?

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 6 points 4 months ago

That which is asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. I'm asserting that WND is a Far Right Fake News and Conspiracy Theory website. The article states that photographs were taken of the alleged victim in an injured state, but the only photo is of the child's alleged mother. Also, even if it did happen, children behaving poorly on the playground is hardly national news. Do you have any evidence which indicates the validity of the story?

[-] realcaseyrollins@noauthority.social -4 points 4 months ago

@Atelopus-zeteki @OnlyTakesLs @BobaFuttbucker Fair point. The original source is a website called #AlphaNews, which has the pictures of the child:

https://alphanews.org/exclusive-mother-says-third-grade-daughter-was-attacked-at-school-because-she-wasnt-muslim/

It was an exclusive, so we'll see. They said the cops were getting involved so maybe they'll make a statement.

Seems pretty clear the girl was attacked, although parents do lie about this typa thing about their kids so "not being #Muslim" might not be the real reason.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 5 points 4 months ago

Do you mean this Alpha News? https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alpha-news/ Detailed Report

Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy Theories, Anti-Islam, Lack of Transparency Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT Factual Reporting: LOW Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://abetterminnesota.org/2022/02/the-truth-about-alpha-news/

The one that has poor sourcing, conspiracy theories, an anti-Islamic slant, and a lack of transparency? Perhaps I've found information on a different Alpha News than the one you are referencing. Though that would an interesting coincidence, as this is apparently an article with an antij-Islamic stance.

this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
-16 points (21.4% liked)

Conservative

357 readers
80 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS