49
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/health@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I'd read somewhere that this program averaged over $300,000 per supported-addict per year, of taxpayer cost.

Having tried participating in "charities" before, I find that number ABSOLUTELY BELIEVABLE.

The US's United Way pours millions of donated-dollars into the personal-wallowing-wealth of its executives.

It will be a "fine, pleasant, moderate, & reasonable" day in hell, before I'll believe that the category "not for profits" is any less corrupt than the other categories ( for-profit operations, governments ).

I hope it was wrong information I saw, disinformation, rather than truth/fact, but .. no "charity" that I've every tangled with would tolerate limiting administration's wealth for sake of honesty.

None.

_ /\ _

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Not-for-profits just means they are less corrupt. (Doesn’t stop them from being very corrupt).

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
49 points (100.0% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2290 readers
239 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS