73
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
73 points (100.0% liked)
Games
16757 readers
594 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Haha not sure how it works in Japan but you’d never get me to agree to that in the US.
"Find another job ASAP or we might shut the branch down. Also if you quit, you'll get a severance package and we'll give you a glowing recommendation for your new job."
It's just how they word layoff and severance package. In Japan voluntary resignation can be also entitled for severance package depending roles/duration of employment, and this gives larger package than regular voluntary resignation is entitled to, to make them resign "voluntary".
Also you can't fire without cause here, and the burden of proof is on the employer should it be contested. Instead they do this and rely on the cooperation/feeling of obligation/"the implication" to get employees out.
Assuming they are all 正社員 (seishain) which are a class of full-time employee, the bar for dismissal is high. In fact, it's common to basically pay employees to go away rather than to actually try to fire them or something. A company can, in actual financial hardship, lay people off. I don't know what the bar for that is or if there are any criteria as to whom or in which order they must dismiss.