171
submitted 4 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/privacy@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You can be tracked with facial recognition, etc. but not in the same way or with the ease of a car as demonstrated in the article so I think that my point is relevant to the article. Sure some states ban or don't have traffic cameras, but in Ohio specifically, we see that a better intercity transit system could be better for privacy.

I already mentioned that sure, mass transit doesn't work as well in rural and remote areas. Clarifying my point on that: planning cities for more density, more walkability and car free travel is good for country people outside of those cities, because it keeps the suburbs from sprawling out into the countryside. These exurbs take up what could have been useful farmland with people who are just LARPing country life and spend 4 hours every day travelling to and from their job that was in the city anyway.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Facial recognition needs a camera. Common but not everywhere.

The issue is police not respecting privacy at all, this does not change when on a bus.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
171 points (98.9% liked)

privacy

2952 readers
1 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS