114
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 29 points 5 months ago

AOC should be running. Actual change.

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

She'd be a very successful candidate no doubt, if the DNC allowed it. You've seen how they did Bernie and he's an old white guy. I can't imagine them going for AOC. They're a fundamentally conservative organisation that exists to vet candidates and prevent anyone with the will to make "actual change" from being in a position to.

Also, they've argued in court that they are not a democratic organisation. They can block nominations entirely unilaterally, to one of the only two parties that can realistically field a presidential candidate. The other party is much more openly corrupt, which is a genuine achievement.

The US electoral system is entirely captured by corporate interests.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

If AOC gets more votes than their conservative candidate in the swing states they might grudgingly take her. She likely would not get more votes because the Repubs have been on a propaganda campaign to discredit her since forever.

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 months ago

You're assuming the DNC even wants to win.

They are a corporate machine with a lot of the same donors as Republicans. Their job is to provide a nominal resistance to the oligarchy, not actually win, govern, or fix things. That's why they don't want Bernie who is not on board with their mission. He was so popular his ideas dominated the primaries, so the DNC pulled out all the stops to keep him from winning, because it would've been very hard to maintain their soft obstructionism with him pushing on so many issues from the bully pulpit.

This is part of why I think you actually should vote for the Dem candidate as long as they're not the raging fascist that Trump is - they don't care about your protest vote or whatever. They will just lose, shrug their shoulders and start fund-raising for the next season where they will continue to be the only viable option because of deeply entrenched structural obstacles to any alternative.

[-] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

Unfortunately there's no chance the middle majority would accept her, she'd be super popular with 30% but really struggle with the rest

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Yes, but...

As the Nation is now we'd have to spend a term preparing everyone for it. Her running would realistically begin within weeks after the office is occupied. Lightly, yes, though running still.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago

Isn't she under the minimum age? Realistically, we should lower it, but until then it's the law...

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

She will be older than the minimum before election day. But she's not running so it's a moot point.

If she does eventually decide to run, she'll have to beat both parties.

[-] tektite@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

According to the internet, she turns 35 in October.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
114 points (78.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9741 readers
729 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS