742

submitted 3 months ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Get in the Hilux.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 months ago

The short name for what you've just described is POSIWID - the Purpose Of a System Is What It Does. There is no meaning in ascribing intent to a system beyond its function, because intentions don't matter. Systems act regardless. If an outcome occurs - our emiseration - and those in charge do nothing to correct it, then they are implicitly approving of it, so it becomes part of the system's purpose by evolution.

[-] notanaltaccount@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

This doesn't preclude policy decisions made by elite politicians funded by the wealthy from being designed to keep lower classes too exhausted to politically mobilize or rise up the caste or class system.

[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

If you read The laws of power and super freakonomics, it's easy to draw the conclusion that ethical companies are out competed by unethical companies, and should a company choose to remain ethical despite that, then the company can come to an end.

It's financial death by a million cuts.

If you refuse to use slave labor to produce your tennis shoes, the company that does use slave labor to produce their tennis shoes can sell their shoes for less money.

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No absolutely not, I agree, and I made the point elsewhere in this thread that anyone who knows "entrepreneurial" types will know that they relish in this kind of machiavellian thinking. They think it makes them so smart and so good at business that they know how to manipulate people into spending money.