102
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tb_@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Nuclear doesn't reduce the difference between supply and demand.

How does it not?
There's a certain "base load" to any power grid which could easily be done by "inflexible" nuclear powerplants.

Sodium doesn't address the problem with EV weight.

Inefficiency is fine if you have an abundance of energy.

Running a country exclusively on renewables comes with its own costs in storage and emergency solutions.
I'm not saying "go exclusively nuclear" either. Supplementing it with renewables should be done.

[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

Say your power supply is 100 low power and 150 high power demand. Giving a need of 50 difference.

If you build Nuclear at say 80. It will give a remanding demand of 20 low power and 70 high power. But the difference remains 50. Nuclear doesn't solve the issue of supply matching demand in anyway.

EV's are going to weigh a lot. Lithium will probably be the main usage in cars. But really the solution is less cars. Need trains.

Running a country exclusively on renewables comes with its own costs in storage and emergency solutions

I agree but I think that route will give lower cost, quicker roll out and less co2

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

It may not reduce the delta, but we gotta cover the base load somehow. Nuclear is ideal for that job.

[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

It's not ideal as it's more expensive than alternatives, and slower. I'm not making the decision so it doesn't matter.

But i will say Australia just made the decision that nuclear has no place and China built a lot of nuclear then stopped and started rolling out renewables.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I don't think 100% renewable is the way to go, given that energy output can vary.

And as long as any amount of fossil fuels are left in the energy supply chain, I'd rather they be replaced with nuclear. Even if it's more expensive.

I'm not making the decision so it doesn't matter.

Perhaps not directly, but assuming you live in a democracy your vote does matter.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
102 points (94.7% liked)

World News

39046 readers
2384 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS