143
submitted 5 months ago by PinkyCoyote@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

The anti-Americanism. We are not all the same.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 months ago

It's more anti-America than anti-American.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Still, dogmatism in any form is a plague. Pro Americanism, anti Americanism, whatever. Ignoring facts to suit your chosen narrative is gross.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Who says people are ignoring facts in order to have a strong stance?

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Why do you believe people who have a strong stance must be ignoring facts to have a strong stance?

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Straw man. Or misunderstanding.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

You admitted it, that's why I am asking.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

You declared a causality that I did not intend to imply.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Still, dogmatism in any form is a plague. Pro Americanism, anti Americanism, whatever. Ignoring facts to suit your chosen narrative is gross.

You are directly implying that pro-americanism and anti-americanism are dogmatism, and that these stances necessarily ignore facts to suit their chosen narrative.

You can elaborate what you meant here.

Even if you did not intend on implying this, you did introduce the concept of dogmatism to a conversation surrounding how Lemmy generally leans anti-America, inserting on your hand an implication that this is due to dogmatism. You're accusing the average Lemmy user of dogmatism by association, simply for holding an anti-America stance.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

That's what I meant by causality. Pro-americanism and anti-americanism are not inherently dogmatic. It's just that the anti-american sentiments I see on lemmy are usually dogmatic. It's an observational theorem, not a derived one.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 months ago

So it's a vibe you personally feel, and wished to interject unrelated, got it.

[-] Bongles@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 months ago

"Anti-Americanism is bad" -> "It's not really Anti-American, it's Anti-America" -> "Dogmatism and belief in something while ignoring countering facts is bad"

It's an assertion of dogmatism on the Anti-America crowd with no real frame of reference.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

More of an accusation than an assertion.

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

You're just not paying attention

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
143 points (93.9% liked)

Asklemmy

44148 readers
1309 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS