289

‘Coordinated arson attack’ brings French trains to a halt hours before Olympics opening ceremony (www.politico.eu)

submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Fires on French railway tracks have delayed journeys for 800,000 travelers in what the transport minister described as “coordinated attacks of malicious intent.”

A co-ordinated arson attack on the French rail system is turning the first weekend of the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris into a nightmare for hundreds of thousands of travelers.

French rail company SNCF announced on Friday its high-speed train system had been hit by "deliberate arson attacks to damage [its] facilities" causing delays and cancellations which are expected to last all weekend.

The disruptions are affecting trains heading East, North and West of Paris, and travelers have been asked to postpone their plans.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

I know this is terrible of me, but... I was originally not planning on watching the opening ceremonies. Now I'm going to scare-watch them.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The timing snuck up on me and I haven't figured out how to get viewing access to them (whether broadcast, subscription, or 🏴‍☠️). Any suggestions?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

For the last Olympics, I connected my VPN to Canada because it was on the CBC for free. Hooray for public-funded media! And if I could send some money to the CBC's way and not have to do that, I would. Same with the UK TV license.

That said, none of my UK VPN addresses are working for UK TV anymore. I'm hoping the Canadian ones still work.

Edit: Seems to be working but it's not live streaming for another 1:45. Here's the link for the CBC. https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.6443205

I use Private Internet Access as my VPN if that helps.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

See? This is why it pisses me off so much when they talk about defunding CBC.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Conservatives talk about defunding the BBC in the UK too. I wish they'd just allow people from other countries to give them money instead.

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 13 points 3 months ago

Defunding public media is not about the money the government spends on it. It’s about eliminating journalism that is not accountable to corporate power and money. The control the wealthy already exert over publicly funded media is never enough, people with the kind of money where control of the media is a possibility want to be able to fire a reporter who pisses them off personally.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

It's crazy how it really is always projection, isn't it? Their primary argument against public media is invoking the boogeyman of government censorship and/or propaganda (but that doesn't really happen unless all the country's media is controlled by the government and that's not what's happening with PBS/BBC/etc.), when it's really that they're butthurt that their own censorship and propaganda is being resisted.

[-] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

PBS and NPR are not owned by the government, they are independent and the majority of their income comes from outside the federal government, only a minority comes from there.

Those who are owned by the government are USAGM, which owns several media outlets, but their target audiences are foreign.

[-] yesmeisyes@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

lol the right wing is talking about defunding YLE in Finland all the time, coincidence?

[-] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

Proton VPN's streaming servers should work

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

RTS and SRF also free with swiss VPN

Or TF1 with french VPN

Or ORF with austrian vpn

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Thanks! For my case, I'm assuming none of them are in English and I'm a dumb 'murcan who barely made it through French in high school, so I'm going to have to stick with Canada. But hopefully that will help others.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

As a 'murcan who took Latin in high school (because SAT scores were a higher-priority goal than actually becoming bilingual, LOL) and is now learning French of my own volition, I think maybe the Olympics would be a relatively good candidate for watching in French. At least with the simpler/less-subjective sports (e.g. track and field, as opposed to e.g. gymnastics), it could be possible to follow along just with the infographics on the screen even if you struggle to understand the commentary.

(Also, thanks for the advice. I've got a PIA subscription that I really don't use enough, so this is a good push to finally figure out how to set it up properly.)

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I like to watch national TV from other countries its fun way to get to know the language and culture

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I used to do that when I was younger, but these days it's usually for something like the Olympics where I want to understand what's going on.

I do get a huge dose of Canadian pride though, so that's fun.

[-] mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago

Showing colour is nothing to be accused of. It should imply the start of a discussion.

What do you expect on the opening ceremonies?

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024

289 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39004 readers

2574 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.