473
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 51 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] Oderus@lemmy.world 79 points 3 months ago

Were fucking Republicans. We freed the slaves. We forced through reconstruction. We were responsible for civil rights. We literally have the historical record to make these arguments to the face of these race obsessed garbage people.

LOL. I so laughed at this line. Some people are unbelievably clueless.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 64 points 3 months ago

Republicans did that. Conservatives fought it every step of the way.

[-] Oderus@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

Republican in name only, or RINO. Republicans back then were the same as Democrats today in terms of policy which I find weird.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

I know that. You know that. I'm not sure the dope you were quoting knows that.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago

They probably do know that, if they know enough to argue that. But they’re also clearly racist for thinking that helping historically oppressed groups is bad and obviously means we want to hurt the advantaged groups (zero-sum at best, but mostly likely projection).

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 6 points 3 months ago

Republicans used to be the urban pro-industrial party, democrats were the party of rural farmers.

Urban industrialists didn't directly rely on slave labor so they were more open to abolitionists. Rural farmers were heavily dependent on slave labor so they were very pro slavery.

It's also why the democratic party has always tried to get universal health insurance passed. The party is made up of farmers with law degrees, so the local Doctor, the only other educated man who it was appropriate to socialize with would come around a lot— so they were constantly hearing stories about how their friend had to accept chickens or food as payment instead of money.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Republican in name only, or RINO. Republicans back then were the same as Democrats today in terms of policy which I find weird.

why?

popular consensus is that barry goldwater was a trump like populist presidential candidate that took advantage of american's very strong disapproval of the civil rights & voting acts and dog-whistled the republican party into adopting its present day policy; do you not see it that way?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

DYK, RINO was originally used to deride those who were not progressive enough.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago

Notice that while they're posting on /r/conservative they don't use the word "conservative" in that sentence. Because then they'd have to say:

Were fucking ~~Republicans~~ conservatives. We ~~freed~~ fought for keeping the slaves. We ~~forced through~~ fought against reconstruction. We were ~~responsible for~~ against civil rights. We literally ~~have the historical record to make these arguments to the face of these race obsessed~~ are garbage people.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

They freed the slaves, but fly the Confederate flag because... um... It's pretty.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

It's just bots arguing with each other over there though.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I bet they also believe Democrats do nothing to help black people in recent times.

Which, to be clear, is true in many ways. Now apply the same logic to Republicans who bleat out "we were the ones who freed the slaves!".

[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

The best things conservatives have done for black people in recent times is being super wierd and thus keeping themselves out of power

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 24 points 3 months ago

I haven't laughed that hard at conservatives in a long time, good times.

[-] MinorLaceration@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Thanks to this I went browsing through that sub. These people are openly blatantly calling for torture of detainees in Guantanamo.

[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

I haven't visited that sub in years, mostly because it made me feel dumber.

But those comments are in weird contrast to what I used to see. I wonder if the veil is finally falling...that'd be wild.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

It's kinda funny watching them notice who Trump is for the first time while still being upset he might not win. There's some comments that are effectively, "enough of the meaningless bullshit, just talk about policy and he'll do better!" as if Trump ever had any attractive policies.

I believe last I heard they were trying to distance themselves from their policies because they realized in hindsight that they shouldn't say them out loud.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They've been doing this for an entire year now. All winter and spring the meta was "we will all stay home if Desantis doesn't get the nomination." They all cringed pretty hard when Trump did his NFT scam.

But at the end of the day they are all intellectually dishonest cowards, so in the end they always just do the only thing they know - lick the boot.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

It's weird to see a contingent of vaguely relatively normal opinions over there, but of course they get decried as "librul brigading" by most of the cult/bots

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago

that was very pleasurable to read; thanks for sharing.

[-] sparkle@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You've got to be fucking kidding me, they're making ads look like comments now???

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
473 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5074 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS