212

More than 550 hajj pilgrims die in Mecca as temperatures exceed 50C | At least 320 of the dead are from Egypt and Saudi officials report treating more than 2,000 people for heat stress (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/world@lemmy.world

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] thallamabond@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago

122 in freedom units. At 126 (52c) you can prepare sous vide in a few hours depending on cut.

https://sousvideways.com/time-temperature-guide/

For real though, I'm to old to fight in the water wars, and it's too hot.

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

you can prepare sous vide

But that's in water. We're not there yet. Maybe in Florida soon when it first floods and then gets a heat dome.

This one is more like setting the Air Fryer at 50°C.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

You set out a container of water and wait for it to heat to 50C

But to be fair, the evaporation will cool it too much for this to work

[-] YerbaYerba@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

Put a glass plate on top. Bam! Solar sous vide

[-] Steve@startrek.website 36 points 4 months ago

Hot tip: when its 50c, stay in the fucking shade!

Not the right time for a pilgrimage smh

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 13 points 4 months ago

Honestly, staying in the shade won't save you at 50c. You're probably going to die unless you find a solution like digging a hole to hide in.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Our overlords assure is everything is normal. Continue consumption. Do not revolt against polluting industries. Stay inside your homes and expire for the economy. This seems to ring true the world over.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I can't fuckin wait until it gets to that boiling point where we just absolutely trash these wealthy families. Part of me wants that to happen more than us immediately correcting this another way. Fuck those greedy rats.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I'd honestly rather everything get fixed than retribution. If it were a choice between the two.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

That may not happen at all.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Bunkers have to have air vents. Air vents can be blocked by concrete, as can bunker doors. It will happen one way or another.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

They won't need the bunkers, they'll easily convince the dumbest half of the population that the climate crisis is a result of too many brown, black, and yellow people and that any action taken should be against those people. We're speeding towards ecofacism.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

Evil doesn't fight honestly. Bunkers are a relatively honest thing.

[-] krelvar@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

I figure we're going to see the first chapter from The Ministry for the Future at some point. This is getting close.

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

It mainly needs a massive power failure in the middle of summer and we're there.

[-] krelvar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Up to 900+ I see.

[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

About 1.5 million people did the Hajj. 320 is approximately 0.023% which cannot be used to draw any conclusion.

Then for those who don’t know, many people go to the “Optional” Hajj unregistered, which means they don’t have an indoor place to stay on or use transportation options and have no direct access to food. There are also the one who are old, the one who take their kids with them, and the one who are sick.

Again the islamic ruling is you do the Hajj “if you can” this include if it is during extreme heat you can just stop or never go in the first place.

[-] bizzle@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Great time to be a lawyer who speaks Arabic, possibly a little Nubian and Sa'idi.

EDIT: What exactly are you disagreeing with? These people have an immediate way to punish those responsible for climate change: through legal action.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Bro didn't hear about the bonesaws

You want to go after those kings, do it with an army, not lawyers.

Like, bro, they're literally sovereigns! They can ignore lawsuits!

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If anything, the bonesaws were a symbol of their weakness. These people are literally dying already.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 4 months ago

That their royalty are cowards doesn't stop them from being a sovereign country. Just what, exactly, do you think a lawyer can accomplish? The UN doesn't announce a global embargo on the lifeblood of modern nations because someone points out they violated a substatute.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago

For example, Oil and Gas Company Weatherford operates in 75 countries. Al Mansoori also has a wider base of operations. Also, again, if lawyers and journalists are so harmless to the GREAT AND POWERFUL ROYAL OVERLORDS™ then nobody would ever need to be butchered. If a large number of people, say hundreds of affected families, in a class action lawsuit all get butchered at once then even Royalty is going to have a very hard time both domestic and abroad.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024

212 points (98.2% liked)

World News

38979 readers

2419 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.