95
submitted 3 months ago by Brkdncr@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 91 points 3 months ago
[-] essell@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Where can you see lions.. Only in Kenya!

[-] Morphit@feddit.uk 16 points 3 months ago
[-] hohoho@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Kenya only see lions through windows

[-] Dremor@lemmy.world 76 points 3 months ago

It's a RISC they are not willing to take.

[-] RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

ba dum tsss

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 24 points 3 months ago

They tried Windows on Itanium and on Alpha. I think the biggest issue is even though the OS could be recompiled, most apps are not compiled at install in order to take advantage of the underlying platform. You saw a similar issue with the original Surface being ARM only. Sure the OS was there but people couldn’t run the Windows apps they were used to and Microsoft got held responsible rather than the developers.

Alternatively you’d have to put an x86 emulation layer which would slow apps down and people would again ask “why?”

[-] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 18 points 3 months ago

One of the great advantages of software distributed with the source code is the flexibility to move to different platforms and architectures. I wonder if moving to a snap/flatpak model will change this flexibility in the future.

[-] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 15 points 3 months ago

They tried that, it's called UWP. A lot of programs don't want to be distributed through the microsoft store though, forcing them to use "old" .exe's

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

God knows I don't want that crap either. They're always bastardized versions of full apps.

[-] Veraxus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Emulation worked (and still works) great when Apple switched from x86 to ARM. It can be done.

[-] erwan@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

Also when Mac went from PPC to x86

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Hmm I wonder why MS has spent so much time converting office apps to run on webview2…

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Microsoft has always embraced their own migration. They converted their apps to UWP. They’re making them platform agnostic with webview2. If you want to run just their software on any architecture that’s fine, but Windows and x86 have been co-mingled and anyone who installs Windows expects their 3rd party software to just work.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They’ve also been pushing PWA hard. A lot of apps run on webview2 even in specialized industries.

I won’t be surprised if we see a larger push to non-x86 and if it’s arm then it’s also possible to go risc-v if app support is there.

[-] pelya@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

RISC-V is not proprietary enough.

[-] ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

as it’s seen as a threat to the tech that the US can influence or outright exert control over

Good

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Why would anyone do that? Even Windows on ARM is only a desperate move by Microsoft to make an appearence of keeping up with times, but RISC-V?

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
95 points (87.4% liked)

Technology

58137 readers
1537 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS