The rule LGBT agenda (www.youtube.com)

submitted 4 months ago by rxin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] SmoochyPit@lemmy.ca 24 points 4 months ago

It’s… all Ohio?

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Always has been

[-] swag_money@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

not to exclude any group but i really prefer the aesthetics of the 6 colour rainbow flag

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

Yeah... adding other patterns misses the point. It's a rainbow. It's a spectrum that covers everyone. It's not like one group owns a given stripe. As soon as a broad symbol becomes a collection of specifics, you wind up asking 'why this group, but not that group?,' and it's a whole thing.

You want a flag that explicitly supports trans people? We had that. It's... the trans flag. And also the rainbow flag, because y'all were already covered. You're even in the acronym.

[-] 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

i think the biggest issue with the progess pride flags are licensing issues. the original designer of the flag with 5 bars on the left published it under a license that retains copy right. i don't care that he's legally in the right, it's sort of a dick move considering the significance of such a flag.