120
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

Right wing meltdown in 3-2-1

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

As if they're ever not melting down.

[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Will there be a gun rebate now? I need to protect myself from this public crisis

[-] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

I think that this might enable them to do some meaningful research into gun violence. Meaningful research that does not exist in the US in 2024 because the NRA lobbies against anyone that attempts to publish data on the subject.

There's a long list of public entities that are prohibited from publishing this research. Really strange in a country where guns are so available.

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Congress stopped research for 25 years. They knew what the results would show and that is gonna make the conversation much more difficult.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No they did not. Tons of research has come out during that time. They put a stop to funding research that held a bias. Which at the time was from the CDC wanting to make shit up to push an anti2a agenda. The head of the CDC stated during that time that they wanted to use research to prove guns are a public health crisis, no matter how the came to that conclusion. They had a ton of really flawed studies as well that were proven to be terrible studies with a major bias. In science you can't just make studies say what you want without being criticized, and that's what they did. It's why the dickey amendment was passed with bipartisan support in 96.

Edit: you can downvote me all you want, this is exactly what happened. This isn't some fake news shit from the repubs, it's actual history. It's not my fault you've been fed a lie that the cdc was bared from studying gun violence.

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

We were just entering the distopian gun fetish hell hole in 96. 2001 pushed us over the edge. Every chaw head feared terrorists and then faux news yelled them into being anxious over their neighbors and urban centers. Science has time and time again shown that faciests are bad and giving them guns is bad for everyone.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The fuck are you talking about? Nothing you just rambled off makes any damn sense.

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Conservatives are really putting out fires.

[-] andrewth09@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I don't see the US Surgeon General as the correct person to make meaningful changes to curve gun violence.

I do see this as the perfect story for right-wing pundits to turn this into a "the military is gonna take your guns" dog whistle.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

They’ll say the gubment is taking your guns either way, so we might as well try and fix shit anyway.

[-] Granite@lemmy.world -5 points 4 months ago

I mean, I follow the logic but this still doesn’t feel right.

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

It feels right to me. People are being injured, maimed, permanently disabled, and killed. All by a particular piece of readily available technology. When we can point to the single thing that causes all those individual health emergencies, and it’s consistently happening across the country on a daily basis to many many people, in public spaces that are otherwise quite safe, that’s most definitely a public health crisis.

[-] newtraditionalists@kbin.melroy.org 22 points 4 months ago

Additionally, all the mental health impacts. Our children are afraid to go to school, a place they are legally bound to be, because of gun violence.

[-] Granite@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago
[-] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 5 points 4 months ago
[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

It's so bad even toddlers are killing people with them.

[-] Hello_there@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago

If you look at gun violence the way you look at disease I'm sure there are correllaries. Cycles of one person inflicting pain on a group, and that group transmitting that pain back onto a different group.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
120 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3985 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS