High court rules Qantas illegally outsourced 1,700 jobs during pandemic (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/workreform@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Decision exposes embattled airline to mammoth compensation bill in major win for the Transport Workers Union

all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

Rain Man could not be reached for comment

[+] whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works -23 points 1 year ago

There is nothing morally wrong with outsourcing. It's not like these jobs are being lost. They will be done by other people.

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Legally there is clearly a problem.

Morally it is abhorrent to fire people during a pandemic while collecting millions in government funding intended to keep people employed.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

There’s something morally wrong with it when you use it as an excuse to pay those workers significantly less. As well, jobs likely were lost, outsourced contracts rarely have the same rights, including leave entitlements, for their workers.

[+] whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works -14 points 1 year ago

Outsourcing usually happens to countries with lower cost of living. Those people get paid less, but their expenses are also much lower.

[-] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Outsourcing typically happens to exploited countries with comprador governments who bend over backwards to accommodate foreign capital. Often in places where the IMF has dismantled labor laws as part of their “structural adjustment”.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Even if you compare PPP, they are significantly worse off. Why the fuck are you in a worker reform /c/ trying to espouse the virtues of saving money by sending jobs overseas?

These companies don’t just move to developing countries because the labour is cheaper. The politicians are too, and they wield that influence to stop labour reforms.

Worker reform is important everywhere. You don’t get to call it okay that one group of workers is getting compensated less than another for doing the same job. That’s utter bullshit.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The illegal part was the firing—mostly union workers whomst's bargaining agreement was going to expire the following month.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The part about them being union workers doesn’t super matter. They were on full-time contracts* and Australia doesn’t have at-will employment.

[-] NoNotLikeThat@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Key word here is "illegally".

[-] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Part of the reason why theyres scrutiny is because Qantus workers are unionized. My coworker from Australia used to work there before moving to the U.S because of marriage.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023

80 points (97.6% liked)

Work Reform

9857 readers

538 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world