this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
117 points (83.1% liked)

Technology

72360 readers
4805 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 74 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So what I dislike about this is that the driver is the one choosing. If the customer was placing their preference, and then Lyft agrees to attempt to place them with their preference (for a surcharge of course, priority service shouldn't be free) that would be something I could get behind. Letting drivers flat refuse service to someone based solely on their gender sounds like opening the doors to discrimination suits.

[–] philodendron@lemdro.id 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Conceptually, sure. But I imagine it’d be a potential lawsuit over workplace discrimination. Especially if the female drivers are being paid more for the same service.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] geekworking@lemmy.world 67 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Male drivers get your discrimination lawsuits ready for your lost income.

[–] nix@merv.news 15 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Did you even read the article? How would women drivers deciding they want more women and nb passengers cause male drivers to lose income…

How is this the most upvoted comment

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Next they should add white people to be able to get only white drivers to make them comfortable! /s It’s obviously sexist and not a real solution to their issues

[–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Your comment makes no sense given the details provided in the article. The toggle runs a gender-based sort on available passengers when a driver indicates they're ready to pick up a new passenger.

  • Male driver, without this toggle, indicates they're ready for a passenger? All waiting passengers are sorted by current algorithms.
  • Female+ driver, with this toggle off, indicates they're ready for a passenger? All waiting passengers are sorted by current algorithms.
  • Female+ driver, with this toggle on, indicates they're ready for a passenger? All waiting passengers are sorted by gender then current algorithms.

At no point does the pool of available passengers for male drivers decrease.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChrislyBear@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So as a driver I have now a filter for better rape and murder victims? Nice!

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I assume they’ll probably check with the gender people put on their drivers licenses or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 years ago

Great news for all the would-be predator Lyft drivers out there!

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Discrimination is never a good thing. Separate but "equal" is never a good thing.

[–] 5BC2E7@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I guess that if I ever use lyft I would describe myself as whichever classification gives you more privilege. In this case I would go with non binary woman

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

Wow, this thread is a bunch of people spouting an updated version of the "men in women's bathrooms is gonna lead to rape" bullshit.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Step 0: Be the sort of scum that would assault a lyft driver
Step 1: Set your identity to non binary as a rider
Step 2: Dress in a way to appear non-binary, even a little bit. Honestly just painting your nails purple and wearing thick glasses is probably enough to not raise suspicion. Most people wont try and question this and interrogate you over it. If they do, filter them off and be a normal rider.
Step 3: If they don't question it, congrats, Lyft has no just done the work of assisting you with finding your next victim, great job Lyft!

Bonus round~!

  1. Be a nazi
  2. Do steps 1-3 above
  3. Set your destination to be somewhere vaguely secluded where your fellow nazi friends are lying in wait.
  4. Congrats, Lyft has now successfully routed a non-binary identifying person directly into you and your nazi friend's clutches, great job lyft!
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Wow good way to make the women feel incredibly unsafe and easily targeted.

[–] autotldr 3 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Choosing this will “increase their chances of matching with women and nonbinary drivers,” according to this blog post from Lyft.

If someone goes through the steps to change their gender in the app, we are going to assume that is how they identify,” Audrey Liu, Executive Vice President/Head of Design at Lyft, said in a statement.

“Inclusivity is a core value at Lyft and we are committed to creating a community in which riders and drivers feel as though they are included and belong.”

Lyft says this feature has been highly requested and will give women and nonbinary people more control over both the driving and riding experience.

Currently, that demographic accounts for less than a quarter of Lyft drivers, which is comparable with the rest of the rideshare industry, according to a report by Gridwise.

Those in launch cities can download the latest version of the Lyft app starting tomorrow, Sept. 13th to access the feature.


The original article contains 478 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] tfw_no_toiletpaper@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wasn't there a BoJack horseman episode almost exactly like this lmao

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, this will end up just as well I'm assuming

[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

John Wayne Gacy is really unhappy with this feature.