A VP candidate who has an extensive history of talking shit on video about the president he plans to serve. Excellent choice. /s
Interestingly, Vance once called Trump “America’s Hitler.”
And he picked the side with America's Hitler, just to be clear about what he is.
And promised to help with the next coup.
Hillbilly Shitbag is cool being America's Hermann Goering.
Are we incorrectly assuming he used "Hitler" as pejorative? I certainly think it is a bad thing, but he is a Repub so he could have meant it as praise.
Vance flipped from being a never-Trumper to being a Trump bootlicker when he figured out that he needed Trump's support to get into a position to fulfill his side of Theil's patronage.
Ohio, still managing to stay relevant in a bad way
My kids were right about Ohio being sus.
Once again reinforcing the negative connotation of “Ohio” in zoomer slang - e.g.:
Vance got dat skibidi Ohio rizz no cap on god
Vance is an opportunist who will say or do anything that he perceives will get him power and attention. So, he's just like Trump.
I would pay a lot of money for someone to take a giant screen to Trump rallies and play clips of him talking shit.
Is there a go fund me for that?
As if Republicans care. Cults don't care about reality, and they won't care that it's obvious Vance stands for nothing.
Biden campaign should buy those clips and turn them into commercials.
Just a reminder of who he is:
I guess it isn't surprising a rapist chose a rape supporter.
Sure, but he's said a number of things that I agree with, too:
“I’m a Never Trump guy,” Vance said in an interview with Charlie Rose in 2016. “I never liked him.” In February of that year, he reportedly privately wondered whether “Trump was America’s Hitler.”
A few months later, when the infamous Trump Access Hollywood tape came out, Vance warned, “Fellow Christians, everyone is watching us. When we apologize for this man, lord help us.” Throughout 2016 and 2017, Vance liked tweets critical of Trump, including that he committed “serial sexual assault” and was “one of USA’s most hated, villainous, douchey celebs.” In a set of since deleted tweets, Vance also criticized Trump’s response to the 2017 neo-Nazi rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, writing, “There is no moral equivalence between the anti-racist protestors in Charlottesville and the killer (and his ilk).”
Christofascists before and after they realize the racists are their core voting block.
He argued "two wrongs don't make a right". So gross.
Good. Doubling down with a MAGA-MAGA ticket brings minimal value. Pretty sure he already had all the MAGAs anyway. Probably thinks he's sure to win now and doesn't need a boost anymore, but that remains to be seen.
Was actually a little worried about a Rubio pick. Similar to picking Pence last time, would've been throwing the non-MAGAs a small bone.
Almost feels like this is the first good news in weeks. Been a rough period.
What a terrible choice. Like Vance brings basically nothing to the ticket. Actually gives me some hope.
It does bring in some things for democrats, like really obvious attack ad ideas. Just play JD Vance's own comments about Trump, over and over again.
I'll bet Tim Scott loving all the decisions he's made in his life still.
JD Vance, from Vance Refrigeration?
It must be pretzel day.
Every day can be pretzel day
Why does he look like he should be wearing a Confederate uniform? Alternatively why does he look like he should be saying ugabooga?
Nailed it
He does have a bit of a Robert E. Lee thing going on, doesn't he?
This is your friendly reminder that Donald Trump needed a new VP because he sent a rabid mob to hang his last one.
Not sure whether to denounce that mob, or wish them better luck next time.
Welcome to Hillbilly Hell.
Called it. They wanted Ultra MAGA.
so what was the final auction bid?
He was voted most likely to be hanged or assassinated by his own party his senior year. What a shoe in!
Sounds like Trump isn't in charge around here 🤔
On a bright side, “Hang JD Vance” still got a nice ring to it
Enough people hate him this will hopefully sink their polls a bit.
Excellent, I was worried he would pick someone compelling.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News