-33
Fuck you Joe Manchin. You will never be welcome. Can't wait for you to disappear forever come January.
As justified as that is, not looking forward to him being replaced by a likely MAGA republican, which is definitely going to happen.
If you needed (more) undeniable evidence that removing Biden at this point was a terrible idea that’s only going to benefit the GQP, here you go.
His opinion is of no importance.
It's amazing that these asshats take the time for Biden to drop out of the race but are crickets on Trump.
Almost as if they want you focusing on something other than what you should be. And if a bought man like Manchin doesn't wake you up to that, then I'm not sure what will.
Who cares what this asshat has to say? Fuck manchin.
Not many have been able to levy as much resistance to productive policies within the Biden administration as this man. It's nice to know what the GOP thinks
Manchin, with GQP money in his pocket, does whatever Moscow Mitch demands, since he's got his hand so far up Manchin's ass he's practically a puppet.
I would argue Manchin is rich enough that he doesn't need compromat to comply. He wants to be an oligarch in New Gilead, so he is kissing the ring.
A little late for that, turncoat.
You can do it Joe! Four more years!
Heck, I'd be happy with 6 more months. Just across the finish line, he could do "Harrison" right after the inauguration.
I mean Biden no ill will. May he live long and prosper. 🖖
Way to reinvigorate his campaign Joe. My new mantra in life is "What would Joe Manchin not do?"
You know if the GOP wants it, it's a bad move.
Biden for weeks: I won't drop out.
Biden, 4 hours after Manchin tells him to: Yessir.
For the record, campaigns that go “oh, I’m considering dropping out” universally die. So they have to maintain the appearance of being strong until they officially decide to call it.
Behind the scenes, it wasn’t was rapid or sudden decision, and manchin’s is a impotent prick, so i doubt very much he was actually influential…
The fact that this was the straw that broke the camel's back for Biden's withdrawal is just the perfect conclusion to his whole miserable administration
Here's to hoping Harris will be less crap
ITT: people who made excuses for Manchin for years pretending that they always hated him.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Manchin called for an open process to replace Biden on the Democratic presidential ticket and suggested Pennsylvania Gov.
Manchin, who had decided against launching a presidential bid against Biden, blamed “both sides” for escalating rhetoric that led to the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a July 13 rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Sadly, their vocal support for President Biden in the face of his irreparable debate performance are just evidence of how much control the far left has over the current administration.”
Welch, a fixture in Vermont politics, argued that Biden should exit the race “for the good of the country” in an opinion piece published in The Washington Post this month.
“While the majority of the Democratic caucus and the diverse base of the party continues to stand with the President and his historic record of delivering for their communities, we’re clear-eyed that the urgency and stakes of beating Donald Trump means others feel differently,” Ehrenberg said in a statement.
Unlike Republicans, we’re a party that accepts — and even celebrates — differing opinions, but in the end, we will absolutely come together to beat Donald Trump this November.”
The original article contains 861 words, the summary contains 192 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Feels like no one wants a democracy and care about superficial things only. This country is doomed.
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
-33 points (23.8% liked)
politics
19107 readers
3060 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS