196
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by activistPnk@slrpnk.net to c/europe@feddit.org

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/11683421

The EU has quietly imposed cash limits EU-wide:

  • €3k limit on anonymous payments
  • €10k limit regardless (link which also lists state-by-state limits).

From the jailed¹ article:

An EU-wide maximum limit of €10 000 is set for cash payments, which will make it harder for criminals to launder dirty money.

It will also strip dignity and autonomy from non-criminal adults, you nannying assholes!

In addition, according to the provisional agreement, obliged entities will need to identify and verify the identity of a person who carries out an occasional transaction in cash between €3 000 and €10 000.

The hunt for “money launderers” and “terrorists” is not likely meaningfully facilitated by depriving the privacy of people involved in small €3k transactions. It’s a bogus excuse for empowering a police surveillance state. It’s a shame how quietly this apparently happened. No news or chatter about it.

¹ the EU’s own website is an exclusive privacy-abusing Cloudflare site inaccessible several demographics of people. Sad that we need to rely on the website of a US library to get equitable access to official EU communication.

update


The Pirate party’s reaction is spot on. They also point out that cryptocurrency is affected. Which in the end amounts to forced banking.

#warOnCash

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 58 points 5 months ago

Will it be inflation adjusted?

If inflation continues (financial repression to reduce debt and mitigate the aging population makes that likely), that 3000€ will soon be 1500€ in today's money and you won't even be able to by a mid range laptop with cash in 10 years.

At the current official 2.5% inflation it'll happen anyway after 28 years.

It's basically a cash ban over the next decades. Great news in the current private surveillance economy.

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Belgium, France, and Spain all have had cash limits of €3k, €3k, and €1k respectively for some time now. And the US has a variety of reporting triggers set at $10k. None of those limits have been inflation adjusted. So indeed more and more people become subject to unwarranted surveillance as time moves further beyond 1984.

But then consider Germany. Germans are wise enough to understand what they give up when giving up cash, so while the EU law has little effect on Belgium, France, & Spain, Germans are getting fucked by the EU on this and AFAIK there is no inflation adjustment at the EU level either.

It’s a shit law but if we must have it I would like to see it indexed to postage costs, which has been going up by leaps and bounds. The cost of printing a page at the library has gone from 5¢ to 10¢ in the past year.. so that would be a good inflation index for this as well.

[-] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 10 points 5 months ago

Germans might legitimately riot if cash is straight up outlawed, so that's why polticians have to resort to underhanded tactics like this.

Personally, I think barrels of Campbell's condensed tomato soup is the best inflation proxy, mostly because it's really funny:

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

And that's while top EU officials are still not being elected, and are in fact personally mostly shitty people and most likely very corrupt and with solid background of being in bed with dictatorships and cleptocracies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 30 points 5 months ago

Just let terrorists do the transactions so you can follow their cash flow. This is only hurting people who need to make some large down payment legitimately and now have to jump through hoops.

[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 13 points 5 months ago

This is only hurting people who need to make some large down payment legitimately

Yes, this is intended

[-] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago

Chat control was beat. This can be too. Contact your MEP, let them know this issue is important to you: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/home

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 months ago

Thanks for the link.

It’s important to note that chat control keeps getting reincarnated. So it’s an on-going fight.

[-] connaisseur@feddit.org 15 points 5 months ago

Seems like this is not an interesting topic to most of the voters. Based on the pirate party blog post this was already put in place mid march, way before the EU election days in june. Seems this did not leave an impact on most people, which will hardly ever handle that much cash anyway.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

In Canada etransfers are usually limited to $3k/day. On big invoices I get paid over multiple days. It's not that big a deal for me. I think people look at it like they can only get robbed of 3 grand a day.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago

The medicines or sex toys I buy is nobody’s business.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

It will also strip dignity and autonomy from non-criminal adults, you nannying assholes!

They are not assholes. They are in fact very smart and steadily moving towards their goal.

They are reducing applicability and efficiency of the means they themselves don't need. Their crimes are done the old-fashioned way, plus when you are a high-ranking official or a businessman or a politician, who'll even try to investigate you if you've done nothing clearly wrong?

By the way, I'm not saying it's a sign of some USSR 2.0 . Rather mafia becoming stronger. Well, look which people hold high posts in EU institutions. They are almost openly mafia tools.

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They are not assholes. They are in fact very smart and steadily moving towards their goal.

They are reducing applicability and efficiency of the means they themselves don’t need.

You just described people looking after the interests of number 1 at the expense of others. We call them “assholes”. That’s the appropriate term for what you describe.

(btw, this is orthogonal to intelligence… there are smart assholes and there are stupid assholes).

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

O-okay, but then it's too weak a word.

[-] misk@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Tax evasion and money laundering rob all of us. I don't like that we have to do this but it's a necessary change.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 5 months ago

This is stupid, money in that range is irrelevant on a national scale. The real laundering and robbing happens in the millions and billions and is committed by people in suits gifting each other yachts and real estate.

[-] misk@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 months ago

Ultra rich don't evade taxes, they avoid them via good accountants legally. What this is supposed to prevent is small/medium tax fraud which really adds up.

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

But as @somguy69 said, money laundering is not committed by the middle and lower classes. Using anti-terror tools against someone who neglects to declare some small income. It’s absurdly disproportionate and takes our option to be free from banks away. It’s a terrible trade-off.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] tortina_original@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Do not forget "art".

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Should go after them too, no?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No it's not. The real money laundering is happening in the area of billions and we lose billions by companies not paying taxes. The normal people here don't matter at all. 3k is tiny, that's less than my gaming PC costs if I want to sell it used. Wtf

[-] misk@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 months ago

Ultra rich should be taxed up to their tits or ears but let's not kid ourselves that 3k/10k EUR limit is going to affect anyone poor.

[-] nutomic@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

10k is the price of a used car so it affects almost everyone. And with inflation the limit will go even lower over time. Its a bad plan all around, and gives more power to states which are already too powerful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago

Criminals make most of their money from drugs. And most law enforcement resources are allocated to fighting drugs.

It's our failed "war on drugs" that is creating a rich criminal class in society.

Legalize and regulate drugs, alcohol, prostitution and gambling and then there won't be a huge criminal economy. What remains can then be easily squashed by law enforcement.

[-] misk@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 months ago

I wasn't talking about war on drugs, those should be decriminalized anyway.

What I keep seeing in my personal life is car repair shops, medical professionals and other businesses that usually charge a lot and then take cash only. It's obvious why.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Tax evasion is a thing, yes. But it's also relatively easy to prosecute by auditing.

Money laundering requires a source of illegal money. And, what you may not realize, money laundering schemes always pay tax. They actually overpay taxes by faking non-existent economic activity in order to make the illegal money legal.

Take away the source of illegal money and money laundering disappears.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

This is about the EU. Prostitution is not criminalized.

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Money laundering has the opposite effect that you think it does. Money laundering takes untaxed money and puts it through a process that results in tax revenue. The /absence/ of money laundering “robs” us, if it’s tax revenue that you have in mind.

The lazy AML enforcement style is what robs us, and it robs us of privacy, dignity, and autonomy. If they would enforce AML the same way they enforce other crimes (getting proper search warrants that respects our human rights when suspicion warrants it), AML would be enforced without collateral damage to law-abiding people.

Enforcement of tax evasion would be a petty cause to use as an excuse to force every single person in the land to patronize commercial banks. Like subjecting everyone to facial recognition and tracking just to make the work of a few shoplifters harder. It’s disproportionate and undermines our freedom because law enforcement wants their job to be easy. We lose our autonomy and options so law enforcement can have a bit of occupational convenience. Which amounts to nothing because criminals will simply tweak their operation.

Our boycott rights have been lost


We have just lost the option to boycott banks in Europe. Banks that:

  • finance fossil fuels
  • invest in private prisons
  • donate to the campaigns of right-wing politicians
  • snoop on us
  • force us to register for mobile phone service
    • force us to share our mobile number with them
  • force us to supply an email address (then they use MS Outlook themselves so MS can see where we bank)
  • force us to use their shitty dodgy closed-source smartphone apps
    • and force distribution through Google Playstore so Google can also see where we bank
  • block Tor users from their website (thus violating data minimisation principles when collecting IP addresses), then at the same time charge an unreasonable fee to offline customers blocked from their website who request paper statements
  • discriminate against people on the basis of national origin
  • lock us out of our money for frivilous reasons like:
    • forgetting to give them an updated ID card copy the instant before it expires
    • block us from donating to Wikileaks.
    • set withdrawal limits in a protectionist tactic against runs on the bank
  • subject us to negative interest rates
  • deploy ATM machines that lie to us

We should have a right to decide whether to enter the private marketplace and patronise a business, especially a shitty industry like banking. We should have a right to boycott bad businesses. In the EU, that right has been lost. It’s a profoundly foolish trade to give up boycott rights so tax evaders have to work a little harder to dodge the auditors. Losing our right to boycott then has the consequence that banks can become even more enshitified because they need not earn our business. The banks can piss on us all they want if we are forced to lick their boots.

It’s a perversely stupid compromise of agency over our own lawful lives in order to make law enforcement a little more convenient and crime a little more inconvenient. To slightly give the cats a bit more advantage in the cat-mouse game at the cost of our liberties.

There are some parallels to the profoundly naive efforts to ban encryption or impose master keys. They want to make it slightly less convenient for criminals at the cost of our autonomy, dignity, and privacy. And they keep trying to push this shit. It’s not enough to push back once because it’s relentless. We must keep pushing back.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Well, most of the EU citizens (most of Western Europeans in fact) had that weird idea that they'd found the third way, where everything is regulated and a honest man has nothing to hide, but somehow this won't be abused by mafia and big businesses and such.

They want to make it slightly less convenient for criminals at the cost of our autonomy, dignity, and privacy. And they keep trying to push this shit. It’s not enough to push back once because it’s relentless. We must keep pushing back.

No, they obviously want those autonomy, dignity and privacy themselves. This is the goal.

It's a very slow and steady mafia takeover.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
196 points (95.4% liked)

Europe

1668 readers
250 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS