131

Shapiro, 51, is the chief executive of a crucial battleground state rich with electoral votes, where Harris is set to campaign with her yet-to-be-named running mate on Tuesday. Speculation had mounted that based on the location of Tuesday’s rally, in Philadelphia, that it may just be Shapiro.

That scenario and Shapiro’s fortunes now appear to have dimmed.

Shapiro has come under fire for his administration’s move last year to pay nearly $300,000 to settle a sexual harassment claim against one of his longtime aides. The deal involved a non-disclosure agreement.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240802014838/https://www.thedailybeast.com/womens-group-to-harris-dump-shapiro-over-sex-case-cover-up

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 month ago

As of Thursday, the Harris team was still actively vetting potential candidates. “They’re watching the J.D. Vance experiment go horribly wrong and they want to be sure they’re doing their due diligence,” a longtime Democratic operative told the Daily Beast.

The JD Vance Experiment sounds like a B-grade horror flic.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

I'm still expecting Trump to "fire" Vance. Most likely after he knows the Dem VP pick.

He's going to have to do something about his free fall and I don't expect Trump to do any introspection.

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Whoever Harris ends up picking for the ticket VP should immediately and loudly call for scheduling a VP debate with Vance. Make them squirm and come up with more excuses for ducking yet another debate.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How many Mooches so far?

Edit: 1.8 Mooches as of 8/2/2024

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

I doubt he’ll dump Vance - that’s how he’s getting the big bucks from Thiel and other tech bros.

[-] 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Plus, he’s convinced he “doesn’t need the votes” to win, so why give up on any VP pick? If he’s going to push fake electors and sew chaos to win, he doesn’t need popular opinions or people.

[-] kn33@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, dumping him because he's worried would be admitting that the VP pick matters and he's not carrying it himself. He's not gonna do that.

[-] 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Honest question: What free fall? It seems the polls have barely moved beyond the margin of error, even if that subtle shift is in Harris’s favor. Am I missing out on Republicans criticizing Vance? I’ve really only heard it coming from the left.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

At the time, it was my prediction and sense of things.

Now I believe it's a bit more established. Free fall may be strong wording, but compared to feeling like he had it locked up... This is vastly different.

Trump is barely even campaigning.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

The JD Vance Experiment sounds like a B-grade horror flic.

Or a shitty prog-rock band where the lead singer hits the stage dressed as a couch.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

JD Vance Experiment is definitely his project where he plays Jazz metal fusion in his basement

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Actually, the J.D. Vance experiment is where they tried to fertilize a couch with human semen.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The JD Vance Experiment sounds like a B-grade horror flic

Or the douchiest prank show ever

Man I hope she doesn’t choose Shapiro. Don’t need more extremist Zionism. I’ll vote for her either way, but if she chooses Shapiro, I’ll have to hold my nose when doing so.

[-] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think he's taken a significantly different position than the other candidates on this. I mean in January, he said "I personally believe Benjamin Netanyahu is one of the worst leaders of all time". He was pretty reactionary about school protests, but for the most part he basically has had the i-dont-want-this-to-affect-my-politics-two-state-i-condemn-violence position that most politicians take, and hasn't been especially deferent to Israel at all.

He's not my favorite, just because he seems kinda... mmmm... politician-y asshole-y to me? But I don't feel like his stance on Israel is the reason to specifically avoid him.

[-] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He’s certainly AIPAC worded. Here is a snippet frok his wp page

In regards to students being "blocked from going to campus just because they're Jewish", Shapiro compared such an act to the Ku Klux Klan. He called for a police crackdown on the pro-Palestinian encampment at the University of Pennsylvania, but later said he was already aware of police plans to disband the encampment after police made arrests less than 24 hours after Shapiro's statement.

As of June 2024, Shapiro supported a proposed state law that would block state funding of colleges and universities that engage in a "boycott or divestment from Israel," a term that the bill defined to include any activity "intended to financially penalize the government of Israel".

First Amendment advocates have criticized Shapiro over a revision to the state employees' code of conduct prohibiting "scandalous" behavior. Pro-Palestinian and Muslim groups raised concerns that the order was intended to chill speech related to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. One First Amendment lawyer from Bryn Mawr called the regulation "impossible to adhere to because it's impossible to understand what it applies to."

[-] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

hmm the "boycott or divestment from Israel" block funding thing refers to Bill 1260, for those who want to dig deeper. It was the first time I'm hearing of that one.

[-] EmpatheticTeddyBear@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

Just announce Kelly. Have an astronaut for VP!

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago

I really don’t see him as an asset to winning. I have never even heard of him.

[-] jprice@kbin.run 18 points 1 month ago

No to Shapiro! We don’t need racist zionists in office. Idk about the rest of you but the zionists in my family are/were low key racists. Chabad. You can’t even acknowledge or touch women. It’s the handmaid tale for Jews. And they LOVE AIPAC. You know AIPAC. The PAC that is blasting racists ads against Cori Bush right now.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago

Shapiro has come under fire for his administration’s move last year to pay nearly $300,000 to settle a sexual harassment claim against one of his longtime aides. The deal involved a non-disclosure agreement.

I already disliked this guy for the op-ed he wrote about Palestinians that just broke. I hadn't seen this. Bounce this fucking loser.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Daily Beast Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

Name: Daily Beast Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: Mixed
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-beast/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

Internet Archive Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

Name: Internet Archive Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/internet-archive-bias/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
131 points (97.8% liked)

News

22890 readers
2768 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS