549

Blinken: Overwhelming evidence Venezuela opposition won election (www.bbc.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

229 comments fedilink hide all child comments

…

His intervention comes as the presidents of Brazil, Mexico and Colombia all called on Venezuela to release the full details of last Sunday's election.

…

It has also attracted global criticism, with many governments around the world demanding the Venezuelan government release proof of the result.

The result has been recognised by Venezuelan allies China, Russia and Iran.

But, the US, European Union and other G7 countries have called on Mr Maduro’s government to release detailed voting data.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 178 points 3 months ago

The result has been recognised by Venezuelan allies China, Russia and Iran.

The three countries most well known for their open and fair democratic processes.

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 62 points 3 months ago

Insert "Why is it always you three" meme here.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Sussy af

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago

Surprised Pikachu

[-] emmy67@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

Mr Maduro accused the opposition of producing fake evidence to contest the result of the election and said the US was behind what he described as a farce and a coup attempt.

Wouldn't be the first time

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

Maduro and buddies are already saying the post election protests were a CIA coup attempt. They knew this was coming and they tried to get out ahead of it.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

And plenty of useful idiots here are parroting him, because "US Bad"

load more comments (7 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 3 months ago

I think the venezuelan government is wrong this time, and the election was rigged, bUT: it coming from the US doesn't mean shit.

[-] toast@retrolemmy.com 20 points 3 months ago

It is sad that on any topic concerning South America, I am suspicious of anything that the US says.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] generichate1546@lemmynsfw.com 30 points 3 months ago

I'm going to wait until I see primary evidence, the US doesn't have the most honest track records with South American countries

load more comments (8 replies)

[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

People should question the USA every time they talk about South American countries. The same as how people question China or Russia when they talk about bordering countries. Super power will do what they can to influence other countries and historical and recent events make it clear that the USA is willing to lie and defend its lies. So people have the right to not believe the USA.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Sure. When it's appropriate. But it isn't appropriate here. There are third party organizations with no love for the US also making statements about this.

load more comments (8 replies)

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago

What about the election in Pakistan? That was clearly rigged yet the US never made a it a problem.

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Did the US remove sanctions on Pakistan on condition that they run fair elections? I ask because I don't know. What I know is that they did so with Venezuela, and yet maduro didn't run free elections.

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024

549 points (95.5% liked)

World News

38979 readers

2473 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.