163
submitted 2 months ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 100 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

These people think she's not fuckable so therefore she's not a woman, and furthermore think women's sports are worthless unless they see the athletes as fuckable. That's it. It's patriarchy with a new coat of paint.

The two genders: male and fuckable

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 months ago

Have some Lemmy Gold.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago

You wouldn't fuck a couch, would you?

Oh, you would? Then mind your own business.

[-] TriPolarBearz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Hey, don't kink shame.

Couches literally have more cushion for the pushin'

[-] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

Wasn't this was the Ancient Greek version of gender?

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 38 points 2 months ago

Ive always had this feeling, increasingly validated lately, that there's some weird push to invalidate all women that the right doesn't find fuckable.

There's all this coming after women for having T, and before the Olympics there's been a rise in this "if you think this woman is attractive (generic female athlete), you're GAY" Content.

[-] boogetyboo@aussie.zone 13 points 2 months ago

It's really obvious when they're having a go at cisgender white women about makeup or certain clothes or haircuts or body types. You always see the same comments explaining to women that they ackshually prefer 'natural looks' or less revealing clothing or long hair or 'something to hold on to'.

It's all through a lens of 'why do you make choices about yourself that don't improve your appeal to me, someone who wants to fuck you'.

That there are women that completely reject all those notions or don't seek their opinions (women who are trans, women who aren't hetero, women who reject traditional feminine looks, women who excel in their careers or physical sports) simply doesn't compute with these people's view of what women are.

The more malicious parts of that mindset lead to that push you're talking about. We as women are still just something that needs to validate its existence. Any deviation from that is viewed as something that should never have existed at all.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

They just hate women and more so if they aren't white women.

[-] don@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

There should be a campaign to purge the right from, well, everything.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

there is, it's just not going very well.

[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Mock them more.

[-] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de -5 points 2 months ago

There were many throughout the years but they always end in authoritarianism, censorship, corruption, surveillance, povery, hunger, death and eventual collapse.

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

What a shit website. Demands I sign up to read lol, uhh no? Ublock, you failed me.

[-] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 5 points 2 months ago

Reader mode easily bypasses that

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Is reader mode available on mobile?

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

It is on mine?

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

Really?! I have never seen a paywall there, and I usually access it using tor browser (so, coming from a variety of countries).

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I'm using mobile. It's a full screen for me, no way I can see to circumvent it.

[-] NoiseColor@startrek.website -5 points 2 months ago

The worst thing to do is to pretend there is no issue. There is an issue, it's an issue people get easily upset about. There has to be a precise way how to deal with it so there is no room for it being a political issue.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
163 points (87.9% liked)

World News

32243 readers
644 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS