381
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 238 points 3 months ago

Harris should refuse Fox because they have claimed in court to be an entertainment channel and not a news organization. If she does use her ABC time she should post that on a giant screen behind her podium.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 125 points 3 months ago

She should agree to Fox if:

  1. It takes place after ABC (so Trump doesn't bail)

  2. Fox airs an explanation, immediately before and after the debate, for the $750 million+ settlement concerning the Big Lie.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 51 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Considering how quick they are to point out that Biden legitimately won the 2020 election now that they had to pay out, Harris should hammer the point that Biden won in 2020 to poke the bear that is Trump. We'll see if Fox is willing to be sued again and not call him on it or cut him off.

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

This is a very good point. If she ever ends up on Fox (hope not), it would be negligent not to use this attack. T**** lost, and he still can't admit this basic, important fact. A fact his lawyers, all around the country, could not escape, in even the most friendly jurisdiction. Some of them are now disbarred because of this. Fox News paid an incredible sum (and lost Cucker) because of this.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago

And continuously scrolling on the bottom during the while thing.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Read article that she refused and told Trump he needs to stick to the debate he already agreed to on a prime time channel. Not all of us have cable but lots of people can pick up ABC. She said she be there whether he is or not.

[-] pythonoob@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago
[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think you mean "broadcast channel" and yes I wholeheartedly agree.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 47 points 3 months ago

They have already responded. Flat out said stop playing games and show up on the 10th or I'll use that prime time spot on my own. Perfectly executed.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 3 months ago

"We're happy to discuss further debates after the one both campaigns have already agreed to," he added. "Mr. Anytime, anywhere, anyplace should have no problem with that unless he's too scared to show up on the 10th."

Gold.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

She already is sticking to the scheduled debate that will be next week and starting that they can schedule additional ones. The whole Fox News stunt likely is an attempt to avoid debate at all.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

The scheduled debate is Sep 10, not next week

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Ah, my bad.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] DxK@lemmy.world 101 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Trump is a weird, scared, old man. He belongs in the dementia ward of a nursing home, not on the campaign trail. If conservatives were capable of shame they’d realize how embarrassing nominating this doddering old weirdo for the Presidency truly is.

Edit: anyone trying to claim he’s not demented gets blocked. I have no patience for that bullshit.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The racist rapist is a total pussy.

🐓BOK BOK BOK🐔

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HauntedBucket@lemm.ee 89 points 3 months ago

The debate should not be held on an entertainment channel.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

I'm sure it will be entertaining

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago
[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 months ago

We need these to start popping up at his rallies

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Nah, I think the current strategy is the best. They try to paint themselves as some "silent majority", when in reality they are just some odd balls, who for some reason are obsessed about having demented, geriatric felon to hold the office off the president.

They are just a group of weird, insane people.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, it would just start fights and contribute to the overall stupidity of everything.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 56 points 3 months ago

Waah, I wanted to run against Biden. Waah, I only want to debate on Fox. Waah, it's not fair!! What a baby.

[-] Karmmah@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

One might even say snowflake

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

Little. Baby. Bitch.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

Weird, small handed, felon, baby, is yellowbellied

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

Old man makes stupid demands, unaware he looks like the weak orange bitch he is

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

"Any time, any place"...

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 3 months ago

I think the way to respond to this is not to acknowledge it. Just keep challenging him to "the" agreed debate on abc. Keep saying he's too chicken to debate you.

At least this nullifies his angle.

[-] Blackout@kbin.run 27 points 3 months ago

I love how all the news orgs this morning worded it that Trump approved of the fox debate as if it was a thing before he made it one. Harris should make him do the ABC one with live fact checking before even considering fascist entertainment news network.

[-] localme@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Live fact checking sounds good to me. I’d also like to see a long-form debate so that candidates have enough time to properly discuss each topic. The traditional format seems so outdated and only helpful for creating soundbites.

[-] Thelemmybud@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Trump wants everything in his favour

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Which I could sort of understand, but then he whines for years about it if he doesn't get his way. Even my young children get over things faster than he does.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Conservatism in a nutshell.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Bruh you pussy footed accepting the debate, you don't get to have it on your terms, you twat

[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Go back to bed, old man

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

I thought you said she already agreed to it. What a weirdo.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 3 months ago

Is it the bone spurs again? Poor, weird, dumb, snowflake Donnie

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Fogey is in no position to demand anything

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"Dodge" implies a degree of finesse. He's throwing a temper tantrum. Again. Because he's afraid he's gonna lose unless he gets to pick the referee.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 3 months ago

do what was promised and well talk

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

How about have it held by Reuters or the AP and every channel can simply pay them to show it?

[-] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
381 points (98.0% liked)

News

23267 readers
3050 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS