37
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aleph@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

To be fair, the community depicted in the show is the communist Utopia that Marx envisioned. The end goal of communism has always essentially been a collection of autonomous, democratic communities.

Where "Tankies" generally go awry is the handwaving away of all the mass murder and totalitarian terror that occured when Lenin, Stalin and Mao had a crack at it.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem is not the communist utopia as envisioned by Marx, the problem is that the way to get to it on a large scale, which was also envisioned by Marx and implemented in every single so-called "Communist" nation is through the Dictatorship Of The Proletariat, which is definitelly not Democratic.

Unsurprisingly in practice every single so-called "Communist" nation out there got stuck at the Dictatorship Of The Proletariat stage: not a single one ever reached the communist utopia stage (even though they all call themselves "Communist"), they all remain authoritarian and all of them essentially just changed to way the local elites are chosen from one based on wealth to one based on Party Membership and connections.

Tankies aren't really communists (of the kind that supports a system were everybody has the same), rather they're Communists (tribalists in one or other of groups associated with those countries which call themselves Communists but in fact got stuck in the Dictatorship Of The Proletariat stage of the path to the communist utopia from were they just drifted backward to having elites just like the rest of the dictatorships out there).

This is why Tankies have a hard-on for any the very hierarchical structure of authoritarianism and a "might makes right" conduct in politics - the ideologies they follow with tribalist blindness are all heavilly subverted versions of the "dream" with layers upon layers of justifications and slogans built over decades (in some case more than a century) to excuse, obfuscate or justify the many and very deep ways in which the countries that promote those ideologies deviate from the utopia that they claim to represent.

Or to put things another way, they're Nazis with a different set of slogans.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

which was also envisioned by Marx and implemented in every single so-called “Communist” nation is through the Dictatorship Of The Proletariat, which is definitelly not Democratic.

The Dictatorship of the Proletariat, as envisioned by Marx, is not a literal dictatorship; it is meant to be democratic.

[-] Slagius@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

I've always thought Dictatorship BY the Proletariat gave a better impression of what the statement actually tried to say. From what i understood of it, its supposed to be that the rules are made by the Proles (working population) rather than the "upper classes".

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Democracy of the Proletariat" would be the most accurate descriptor, but no one ever accused 19th century writers of not being melodramatic enough.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, I suppose the Confiscation Of The Means Of Production could happen by majority vote if it was possible to get most people to agree to it ...

That said, I know of not a single example out the were the Dictatorship Of The Proletariat wasn't done by force, either at first or eventually.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I mean, every revolution is done by force, including democratic ones. Most successful communist revolutions were backed by the considerable resources of the Soviet Union, which put special emphasis on destroying all democratic-left opposition.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Revolutions where power gets centralized for long enough suffer from the problem that every asshole in the land now knows were to go to for maximum personal upsides (and there are lots of them with lots of different techniques and some are even smarter than the top revolutionary idealists, so you can't stop them all) and trying to create an utopia against natural human tendency is one of those cases where power has to be centralized for an infinite amount of time, so it will most assuredly end up corrupted no matter how pure the intentions of the original revolutionaries.

In the real world with real people even the most honest of idealists will end up overrun by the assholes if they've created and put themselves on a nexus of power. This is actually IMHO why Democracies have the concept of the 3 independent pillars (Judicial, Legislative, Press) - they're meant to be separate nexus of power watching each other - and even then just look around to how deeply subverted that stuff has been all over the World in supposed democratic nations thanks to how Capitalism makes sure Money is the 4th power, strong enough to overtly buy the Press and also to "buy" members of the Legislative and Judiciary.

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Seizing the means of production and the dictatorship of the proletariat are totally different concepts, though.

Flipping through the Communist Manifesto for a few choice words and then using them totally wrong isn't really bolstering your case.

[-] SattaRIP@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

An important place these countries fucked up is including nationalism in their attempt.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Everyone's the same and has equal rights but boo foreigners and anyone who's different.

I suppose if the USSR had really committed to communism they'd have been perfectly all right with capitalism, because it's just how they want to do things.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tankies whenever good press can be used to their favor: "L-look at how humane and progressive we are"

Tankies whenever they actually are discussing policy: "lmao grow up anarkiddie, the vanguard knows more theory than you, we're in charge"

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

"DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MANY BOOKS, BLOGS, MEMES AND YOUTUBE VIDEOS I'VE SEEN?"

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

"STOP TALKING ABOUT PRAXIS AND READ THEORY!"

[-] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

The ever shrinking seed conditions for communism to take root.

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

yeah damn i'd hate to live in a commune led by a democratically elected council

[-] skulbuny@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is anarcho communism, not mao/lenin/stalin communism (tankies)

Edit: oh wait nvm you're talking about it being posted by a tankie. Strange they advocate for anarchism :P

[-] BeefDaddySupreme@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tankies think that only fascist should be reeducated or walled. .

. . They also think that everyone who doesn't agree with them is a fascist

[-] nxfsi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

One only needs to look no further than the CHAZ to find a shining example of a real life democratic commune.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago

is goat a paid troll?

what's this obsession with "tankies"?

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Hatred and extremism should be disavowed and opposed wherever it is.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
37 points (81.4% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1345 readers
2 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS