7
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Has India ever been free of corruption enough to actually be a democracy? I get that Modi is a fascist and all, but has the "world's largest democracy" ever been anything but a sham for the average Indian?

[-] BeatNik@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't democracy collapsing everywhere? The USA's electoral voting system means democracy doesn't exist. A vote in California is worth 27% of a vote in Wyoming in terms of representation. Add on blatant gerrymandering and you've got a rigged system.

The UK has introduced voter ID laws for a problem that never existed in the past. The UK has also had multiple unelected prime ministers due to the way that the parliamentary system works.

Democracy is on the wane everywhere.

[-] Detry@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Vote weight is fairly common as it provides minority groups a bit more control of their areas. I find that reasonable. There is no such thing as perfect democracy unless you voted on every single issue regardless of importance and that is simply not practical. Sure things could be designed a bit better but the majority of democratic countries have systems that are working quite well. The biggest destabilizes now likely comes more from social media that spreads every dissatisfaction because it sells and makes people think the world is coming to an end. It's not. Or at least not because of failing democracies.

[-] curiosityLynx@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Haven't seen any indication of it being in danger in Switzerland. But we have proportional voting rather than first past the post and referenda are common.

[-] Nighthawk@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I was going to say this. The older democratic systems (easily identified by 1st-past-the-post) are falling apart at the seams, but the rest of us is (relatively) fine. Places like the US and UK need to change their system, but politicians have an incentive not to change anything.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Places like the US and UK need to change their system, but politicians have an incentive not to change anything.

Fortunately with the US, its decentralized system allows experimentation at the state and local level. My city (Portland, OR) just switched to ranked choice voting for city council along with a host of other changes. Voters statewide will soon be able to vote on using RCV for state races. Meanwhile, ranked choice has been implemented in several other states and localities across the country. It will take a while, but I think ranked choice will become the norm within a few decades.

[-] Psephomancy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately the form of RCV used everywhere in the US is Hare's method, which eliminates candidates based only on voters' first-choice rankings, which largely just perpetuates all the same problems as FPTP. There are many other better reforms. One of those should become the norm instead.

load more comments (35 replies)
[-] Jaximus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Well it is Bourgeois democracy that's slowly been consumed by corporate power. Globally

[-] Cybermass@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah literally, this same thing can be said about every country on earth. The only places where corporations haven't infected the government are ones like Afghanistan that have no strong corporations.

[-] Jaximus@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Haha true that. This was inevitable btw, the further capitalism develops the more its will absorb everything. Religion is done for, community is done for, bourgie democracy is dying, next come nationality I guess, the environment is already compromised. It truly is a vampiric black hole.

[-] Amir@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Religion is done for

This is not because of capitalism. Religion has been used as a justification to extort money - look at the Catholic church in the Medieval times. If capitalists could make you believe that giving them money had any correlation with the afterlife they would gladly do so.

[-] averagedrunk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

One plenary indulgence, please.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BurnTheRight@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Conservatism is a global plague of deception, oppression and death. It always has been.

[-] Snowpix@yiffit.net 0 points 1 year ago

Who downvoted this? Conservatism has always been an ideology that's opposed to progress, democracy and freedom. It holds back society to preserve tradition and "family values" while promoting xenophobia, bigotry, and unquestioned submission to authority. The most conservative states in the United States are also some of the poorest, with the lowest standards of living, and also the most backwards. It isn't much different in other countries. The Nazis were conservative. Islamic countries with Sharia Law are conservative. And right now, American Conservatives are trying to implement a Christian-flavoured Sharia Law.

[-] RedCanasta@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

~~Conservatism~~ Capitalism has always been an ideology that's opposed to progress, democracy and freedom.

There you go, I fixed that for you.

All political entities serve the needs of capital first and foremost in a capitalist system, people are only a secondary...if that.

[-] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Speaking as a Marxist, this is false. Capitalism was once the historical progressive force against feudalism. This was already waning two centuries ago, but it was not always true.

Glad another Marxist said it. The problem isn't that capitalism was always the wrong choice, it's that we're clinging to it long beyond its best before date.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Sure but did capitlism really defeat feudalism? Seems like the other side of the same coin.

[-] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, it did, though vestiges still remain. That's what the French Revolution overwhelmingly was, the bourgeoisie claiming power over the old feudal nobility and the monarchy (as anything but a figurehead). Also the American revolution and many others.

They resemble each other because they are in all cases the "owning class" claiming the seat as the "ruling class", just as the slaveholders of classical antiquity and the patriarchs of pre-historical agrarian/pastoral societies.

It's kind of a tangent, but in explaining the concept of equality, Lenin discusses some of the differences between feudalism and liberal capitalism in a letter here.

There are places such as Thailand and Bhutan where the struggle is still alive between the two modes of production, but those are the very rare exceptions to the global order of liberal capitalism (in various forms) vs whatever you want to call the theocratic capitalism of Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. vs the state socialism of the PRC, Cuba, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aragon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

When a party form a government on its own i.e without any coalition partners, they tend to target the opposition with all the arsenal be it CBI , ED and sometimes even the Judiciary. However the elections are fair and impartial for the most part. Just recently, BJP got its ass handed to it in a state election in Karnataka. They may win the federal election again but it is hardly a death of democracy. Their grip on states have been slipping and once it goes out, they will most likely lose the federal government as well. The same happened during Indira Gandhi era. The same is happening now. Democracy survived then and will survive now. I am not saying there is no assault on democratic institutions in India. But they have proved resilient enough to prevent a democratic collapse as portrayed in this article.

[-] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

And it's already been pointed out that the actions of Trump and Bolsonaro mirror the same undermining strategy but failed. Still, Modi controls nearly all the media now so it's going to be stronger propaganda than Fox News.

[-] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

and just look at what happened to Fox News: finally knocked off of their pedestal after decades of being #1-- by MSNBC

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

MSNBC which does only marginally better reporting than Fox News. I have mixed feelings about this.

I haven’t looked at the numbers but I wonder if this is driven by the consolidation of media consumption by left-leaning consumers and the fracturing of media consumption by right-leaning consumers.

[-] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh, don't get me wrong, I'm not simping for MSNBC-- nor any corporate news conglomerate. I was just commenting on Fox News's fall from... well, whatever it was. the top.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I feel the same. So while I do enjoy watching their decline I’m not sure this represents an improvement in the media ecosystem as a whole. I suspect a lot of former Fox News viewers have now been sucked into far right or even fascist media sources.

[-] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

You want to know what's truly disturbing? The previous Australian Federal government did many of these same things too, or worse.

It seems true democracy has fallen out of favour.

[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The politicians and corporations think it's too hard to get their agendas implemented with the will of the people in the way.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32286 readers
510 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS