95
Every American's Social Security number, address may have been stolen in hack (www.fox5dc.com)
submitted 2 months ago by StevenSaus@midwest.social to c/usa@midwest.social
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments 
    A hacking group called USDoD claims to have stolen 2.7 billion records of personal information from Americans, including their Social Security numbers and physical addresses.
    USDoD offered to sell the stolen records, which included personal data for everyone in the US, UK, and Canada, to a forum of hackers.
    The data was stolen from National Public Data, a platform that offers personal information to employers, private investigators, staffing agencies and others doing background checks.
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 7upCoconut@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

So National Public Data is going to be held accountable?

Right?

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Right?

[-] SineSwiper@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago

I can immediately imagine the Anakin 4-panel in my head.

[-] Doom4535@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 2 months ago

Honestly, we need to replace social security numbers if we insist on using them as a form of identification (they never were designed for this); they follow a pattern (which is publicly available) and can be partially predicted without knowing too much about the individual. They were originally for Social Security only (hence their name), but then the IRS decided to use them for ID and then others followed suit, and we got to where we are now

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 13 points 2 months ago

We don't insist on using them as identification. Insurers, credit companies, and other business interests used them as identifiers and then tried to magically make them secret for some stupid reason that probably involved saving them money.

SSNs are just a string of numbers. My college test scores were posted by SSN in the mid 90s before the credit companies started to pretend they were secret, because it was an easy way to make them visible without posting people's names. It also helped avoid confusion when two people had the same name.

Some company having access to SSNs should NOT be important in any way. It is, but only because of credit and other companies treating it like a national secret.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

It’s an example of how being efficient and being lazy are sometimes just perspectives.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Lol again?

[-] activ8r@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

So Americans have a number that was never intended to be used for identification, but they give it to everyone to prove who they are... And if the wrong person gets it they are fucked? Is that right? Because it feels wrong, but that is my understanding of it.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago

Your understanding is accurate.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Keep your credit locked at the top 3 credit reporting companies and you're magnitudes more safe. Only inconvenience is needing to temporarily unlock your credit when applying for a new card or loan, but it's a minor downside for a massive upside of making it nearly impossible for someone to take out a new line of credit in your name.

Some of the credit companies try to trick you into paying a subscription to lock/freeze your credit. It is free at every single one, don't give them a single cent.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
95 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1893 readers
231 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
simsymbiote@midwest.social
Type1@midwest.social