[-] Vent@lemm.ee 10 points 9 hours ago

Dems could run Jesus Christ himself and half the country would still reject him

I mean, that is undeniably true, but we've known that for a lot longer than two days.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 132 points 1 day ago

It is a universal axiom that any question starting with "Will Trump ever face consequences for..." can be answered with "no".

If, instead of prison, Trump was faced with a free luxury mansion on a private island and a $1B/yr pension to live out the rest of his years Epstein style, Kamala may have had a chance. As soon as the alternative included a hint of repercussions for his actions, the universe simply could not allow it.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 102 points 2 months ago

� is used to represent an invalid character, so it makes sense that it'd appear often when bad data is being rendered (or good data is being rendered improperly).

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 131 points 2 months ago

I'm at a loss

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 84 points 3 months ago

Fake. Squidward is eating a Krabby Patty.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 171 points 3 months ago

But... it's cybersecurity. What is a "brief visual and non-intrusive room inspection" even looking for? Anonymous masks? Green terminals with scrolling text? People shouting "enhance" and/or "I'm in"?

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 89 points 3 months ago

Dems controlled the Senate with the slimmest majority possible. One fucker that owns a coal company was able to tank all meaningful climate bills and there was nothing Biden or anyone else could do about it. You can forget about any progressive policies in that environment, lol. Biden did well with the tools he was given.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 93 points 5 months ago

Only if you're using a bad font that doesn't differentiate between I and l

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 84 points 1 year ago

Have they considered doubling the number of prisons and providing police with tanks?

582
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
158
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Vent@lemm.ee to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Title is somewhat misleading. It's not for anything video-related. It's for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

25
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Vent@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

Title is somewhat misleading. It's not for anything video-related. It's for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 170 points 1 year ago

"If it can be done and it is done, for example, for crimes such as child pornography, for intellectual property, which is stealing, they should have to do it too." - LaLiga chief Javier Tebas

Ah yes, two equivalent crimes: CSAM and... um... watching sports without paying

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 93 points 1 year ago

Damn and Facebook ratted them out

160
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
287
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/reddit@lemmy.ml
100
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/datahoarder@lemmy.ml
56
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/syncforlemmy@lemmy.world

It's been nearly 10 days, hand it over Google!

997
Woke Adapter (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.ml
-11
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
43
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Vent@lemm.ee to c/cat@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/3610354

Looking to pick up a self cleaning litterbox but there are a lot of options. The coolest one I've seen by far is the CatGenie Automatic Cat Box, but it's nearly $500 and seems a little overkill.

I've also seen that the PetSafe Litterbox is a very popular choice, but it uses proprietary litter refills and crystal litter when I'd prefer clay litter.

I've been getting away with a $15 do-it-yourself litterbox just fine for a while, but I think I (and my cat) would appreciate something that doesn't require daily maintenance. Something as simple as an automatic rake would be interesting.

My main goals are:

  1. Requires as little maintenance as possible while keeping my cat happy and the smell under control
  2. No proprietary lock-in (I can use my own litter)
  3. Doesn't break the bank
  4. Built well, won't break / easy to fix / good warranty / cheap enough that I can just buy a new one if it breaks

While I am looking for budget friendly options, I'm also curious on the more expensive options. I can't imagine what justifies spending $700 on a Litter-Robot when emptying a litterbox manually isn't that bad and the CatGenie is $500 and promises zero-maintenance. Have you had good luck with premium options like that?

view more: next ›

Vent

joined 1 year ago