Why weren't these people saying things BEFORE this all blew up? Why?!?!?!!???
Because they’re complicit, and at the time they thought they’d get away with it
Because they were hoping to get away with it and be on the side of the jackboot instead of failing and having to deal with the consequences of their actions.
Because the alternative is going to jail for the crimes Trump ordered them to commit.
Facing consequences will do this to people.
Is this a real question? Seriously?
Just a reminder that Ty Cobb (along with John Dowd) is the absolute genius who decided to have lunch at a restaurant directly next door to the New York Times Washington bureau and loudly discuss strategy on how much to (not) cooperate with the then-ongoing Russia investigation into the Trump White House ... while a New York Times reporter happened to be having lunch at the very next table.
I've actually met and somewhat know this guy. All his one-on-one discussions are loud af and he's the kind of guy that blurts out comments during presentations, to the point where it became a bit of a joke to those around. Seems like a decent guy for what it's worth though
and all you cunts played right along, didn't you
Pepperidge Farm remembers
Ty Cobb, huh? I wonder what his parents think of black people.
It's disappointing that Sandy Claws worked for Trump.
Who knew Tommy Chong was trump’s lawyer?
I'm sorry but in all honesty who gives a shit at this point? What is this whole drawn out process going to tell anyone that they didn't already know or instinctually feel? Who's genuinely going to be swayed in one direction or another? Every Trump post is essentially redundant at this point and frankly has been for years. Same as every Hunter post. What new thing are you going to learn from this?
The world wasn't broken all at once. It was broken slowly, methodically, by repeating falsehoods often enough that people believed them to be true. We'll have to tell people the truth the same way: persistently.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News