283

Donald Trump’s former White House lawyer, Ty Cobb, saw evidence of obstruction of justice in the former president’s alleged orders to one of his long-time aides.

Cobb joined CNN’s Erin Burnett on Tuesday to discuss the new reporting that Trump made to-do lists for his assistant, Molly Michael, on the back of the marked classified White House documents. Burnett was particularly interested in Cobb’s thoughts about how Trump reportedly ordered Michael to tell investigators, “You don’t know anything about the boxes” of classified documents he kept at Mar-a-Lago.

Trump faces obstruction of justice charges for his alleged subversion of the government’s efforts to retrieve those documents, so Cobb took the former president’s words as an order for his staff to commit obstruction as well.

“I hear Trump — really, for the first time in terms of the way this evidence has rolled out — speaking in the terms of a mob boss, giving a direct order to somebody that he probably should have no reason to believe would lie for him, but expecting [Michael] to do so,” Cobb said. “There’s a difference between loyalty and breaking the law, and that’s not a line she was going to cross. So it really is Trump directly ordering obstruction, and that will certainly be helpful to enhance the credibility of others who will testify about the obstruction.”

Cobb made his point by bringing up Yuscil Taveras, the former IT director of Mar-a-Lago, who made a deal with Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office to cooperate with prosecutors in exchange for immunity. The assessment from Cobb also backs up multiple legal commentators who agree that Trump’s reported orders look like witness tampering on top of his mishandling of classified documents.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

Why weren't these people saying things BEFORE this all blew up? Why?!?!?!!???

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Because they’re complicit, and at the time they thought they’d get away with it

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

Because they were hoping to get away with it and be on the side of the jackboot instead of failing and having to deal with the consequences of their actions.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 21 points 1 year ago

Because the alternative is going to jail for the crimes Trump ordered them to commit.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Facing consequences will do this to people.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Is this a real question? Seriously?

[-] athos77@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

Just a reminder that Ty Cobb (along with John Dowd) is the absolute genius who decided to have lunch at a restaurant directly next door to the New York Times Washington bureau and loudly discuss strategy on how much to (not) cooperate with the then-ongoing Russia investigation into the Trump White House ... while a New York Times reporter happened to be having lunch at the very next table.

[-] aesopjah@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

I've actually met and somewhat know this guy. All his one-on-one discussions are loud af and he's the kind of guy that blurts out comments during presentations, to the point where it became a bit of a joke to those around. Seems like a decent guy for what it's worth though

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

and all you cunts played right along, didn't you

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Pepperidge Farm remembers

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Ty Cobb, huh? I wonder what his parents think of black people.

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's disappointing that Sandy Claws worked for Trump.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Who knew Tommy Chong was trump’s lawyer?

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry but in all honesty who gives a shit at this point? What is this whole drawn out process going to tell anyone that they didn't already know or instinctually feel? Who's genuinely going to be swayed in one direction or another? Every Trump post is essentially redundant at this point and frankly has been for years. Same as every Hunter post. What new thing are you going to learn from this?

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

The world wasn't broken all at once. It was broken slowly, methodically, by repeating falsehoods often enough that people believed them to be true. We'll have to tell people the truth the same way: persistently.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
283 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2675 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS