205
America in general seems to have a massive problem with absolute geriatrics refusing to make way for the next generation. Their politicians, lawmakers, judges, all older than the hills.
It's because the system for choosing successors are bad and random. If she quits now her successor will be a Biden appointee and she doesn't want that. If they set a retirement age and regularly had roundups where each party gets to choose judges based on number of seats they have things would be a lot more shill.
That is if republicans honestly engaged with the systems. We know they don't which is why nothing will ever work.
She's 96. She should have retired when Bush was president of that was her concern.
OK, that explains a lot actually. Do you think she'll try and hold on another four years if Biden gets reelected?
Lets see if she can hold on until the election. at 96 you shouldn't bet on them being around for another month. she will try to hold on for as long as possible but the grim reaper generally dont care about your schedule.
At 96 she shouldn’t buy any green bananas.
We really do. The millennials need to step up. I'm finishing my degree and am considering a post bachelorette in political science or something similar to get into politics. It's frustrating to see such an aged population making decisions they won't have to live with.
Baccalaureate?
Damn autocorrect.. yea. I'm going to leave it because I deserve that.
Mitt Romney just stepped down, citing that very reason. The U.K. has a freaking House of Lords and a Monarch that serves no purpose. Don’t throw stones.
Some of those people either can't afford to retire or have actually returned to the workforce due to a combination of inflation, inadequate safety nets, and the fact that 401ks have not filled the gap created when companies stopped providing pensions.
Why aren't we more suspicious of the personality type that wants to work til they die at their post?
"Life appointments" should really only extend to something like age 75, with yearly mental fitness tests after the social security age.
she was asked to undergo medical fitness test but refused
This is proof enough of senility.
(in context and in my opinion).
The lady doth protest too much, methinks
I agree with it except for the mental fitness test.
Tests like that is only going to be used as political fodder.
Just set it at an age. You get to finish out the year's session after you turn 70 but after that, you aren't qualified. Go enjoy your life!
Just link it to the legal retirement age.
Sounds like she has a problem being judged by others I don't believe it a coincidence.
I do not understand why someone in their dang 90s does not retire. Spend your days like my great-grandma did before she passed: time with your family and drinking whiskey on your porch.
Money combined with low stress tasks, probably.
You can imagine the kind of tasks and stress she has that she can allow herself to work until 96.
You think a person in retail, engineering or whatever low to middle income position would want to work until 96?
96.. let that sink in. Way too old to making any legal decisions.
96?! Just go home already.
She belongs in a museum. Jfc GTFO you dinosaur.
I see what they're doing. Stress her out enough to kill her. Classic.
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
205 points (99.0% liked)
News
23268 readers
2904 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS