110
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

RFK has been sell his endorsement to both campaigns. And it looks like ‘ol transactional Trump is buy’n.

Trump will gladly take votes in exchange for appointing a conspiracy theory nut to some sort of administrative health and science position.

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 21 points 2 months ago

I don't disagree with you, but I think what is even more likely is Trump will promise him a cabinet position in exchange for dropping out, but he won't actually follow through with it.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Like Chris Christie.

[-] c0smokram3r@midwest.social 28 points 2 months ago
[-] plz1@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

So last week, angling for position in a Harris admin. This week, likely dropping out and supporting Trump. This guy is giving Lindsey Graham a run for "best political windsock" awards.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

RFK on Friday:

[-] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Figures. It was always about him.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

"..but the worms would not let him."

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

If he endorses Trump, I hope the Harris campaign releases hidden footage of him showing up to beg for a cabinet position.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago

The spoils system ended with the assassination of Garfield.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

They could always use someone to handle road kill meats.

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

Didn't he admit to having some sort of brain damage or mental issue?

Not saying that is a problem in general, but more that he's completely unhinged.

[-] rockmeat@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They found worms in his brain. Pretty late, too

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

harris should make him ambassador to some uninhabited island in the pacific or something

[-] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

How hard were the sources laughing?

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
110 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3976 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS