132

The Google antitrust remedy should extinguish surveillance, not democratize it (pluralistic.net)

submitted 2 months ago by Anonymouse@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I thought this group may enjoy this read about a suggestion on an option to take in the Google antitrust lawsuit. Of particular interest is that certain groups feel that the "right" approach is that everyone should be able to surveil the population, Google-style and the choice quote:

The judge repeats some of the most cherished and absurd canards of the marketing industry, like the idea that people actually like advertisements, provided that they're relevant, so spying on people is actually doing them a favor by making it easier to target the right ads to them.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Man I just wish all unsolicited ads would be banned, it would make the world a much better place. If I want promotional content or information about product portfolio from somewhere, I will request it directly.

[-] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I feel like the whole advertising machine needs to be reimagined. I'm not opposed to learning about new and better products, but I've been conditioned to immediately distrust anything coming to me in the form of an ad. Pair this with the mindset of advertisers that they can't do their job without stalking every individual and it's a recipe for a global-level human rights violation.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

Because we all need targeted ads

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

I wonder if part of the reason for supporting this is that they like the secondary effect that all this information is now also available to governments

[-] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

that could be, but reading between the lines, it seems that the judges have just been brainwashed to think like the media companies want. The article mentions "users WANT targeted ads" and yet when given the option, 90% of FB users shut off targeting.

[-] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

One thing I forgot to add to this was a different article by the same author: https://pluralistic.net/2024/08/19/apologetics-spotters-guide/

Referencing a book, the article lays out the corporate BS playbook for pushing back on changes. In the anti monopoly ad space, they're currently running play 1: there is no problem, people want targeted ads.

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024

132 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

31607 readers

127 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS