505
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] abcdqfr@lemmy.world 107 points 3 months ago

Small typo in the headline *gestapo

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 106 points 3 months ago

I assume they’re trying to take this off the ballot because they know it’s going to increase turnout for the Dems. The majority of Floridians are not down with the abortion ban.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They can't take it off the ballot, as it had way, way more than the required signatures, but they can intimidate every person who signed it into not voting by sending cops to their home.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Actually, this can be good for the Republicans. The pro-life crowd is a minority, but also the biggest, most reliable single-issue voting block.

Having it as a ballot initiative lets pro-choice Republicans vote to end the ban while the GOP still panders to the pro-life voters.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 54 points 3 months ago

It's pretty cool when your governor can send people to come get you. Come on, Ronnie. Let's have some pudding, you little bitch. You're out of power in 2027. Let's dance.

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

The guy supposedly won by like 15 points a few years ago (after barely winning previously). I know it's unbelievable (along with Abbott's fairly big win in Texas while killing people with power outages). But either they're rigging elections (more projection, what a surprise!), or massive numbers of deplorables are flooding the state (and/or sane people are escaping).

That said, fuck 'em. This kind of pathetic, cruel, lawless behavior will continue escalating until there are real consequences. Wish we had a ruthless DOJ to harass them back at every step.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 50 points 3 months ago

Fun fact its legal to just own a flame thrower in the US without a license or anything.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That depends on the state. States with fire problems, such as California, have extra restrictions. And since it's not a firearm, ironically, the Constitution can't protect it.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Im just talking federal here, if ya want an actual fire arm just get a black powder one. Owning a modern artillery piece may be illegal but owning one thats from the ante bellum period loaded with grapeshot is what the founders damned well intended.

[-] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[-] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

Just as the founding fathers intended.

[-] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Look man....if I wanted a fire arm I'd buy a burn suit and a bunch of naphtha!

[-] Oyml77@lemmy.today 48 points 3 months ago

Just when I think this rat fucker can't get any lower, he proves me wrong.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Hey now! No self respecting live rat would fuck that guy. Call him out for the necrophilia/rape too!

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 39 points 3 months ago

Good thing Florida is the stand your ground state

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Oh no police are always an exception. After all if they don't have the right to shoot people for whatever reason they want to make up, how are they ever supposed to be able to do their job of a opressing people?

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee -2 points 3 months ago

Good luck with that. Reminds me of the people who say they need guns to protect themselves from the government. They aren’t wrong, but they very much are.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Based on what rule of law? Can whoever sent the police be sued?

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

What are you going to do? Call the police?

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

lol

Civil disobedience is a valid tool in a state with rule of law. If it’s a failing state where law is applied selectively, you jump ship or you buy protection, where the latter route can get really expensive and isn’t a guarantee.

The power exchanges in Stalins USSR show that no one was ever safe, including the key committee members. So people who want to create a fascist regime of some sort will be in for a rude awakening when they find that their money only goes so far.

Edit the movie Death of Stalin is not a serious historical perspective, but it shows a lot of the dangers of creating conditions for a police state

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago

the movie Death of Stalin is not a serious historical perspective

It's accurate and it's broad strokes in the the things that happened and did sort of happen

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

The same people who sent the police already have Corrupt Clarence and Treason Flag Alito to create an original interpretation of the First Amendment for this one.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

As the story stands, we probably don't have anything showing intent to suppress free speech, which is what I supposed to lawsuit would be based on. It's possible that there's information we don't know yet, or that isn't written in the article, but at the moment I don't think a lawsuit would get very far.

This is one of those situations where it feels like you ought to be able to sue, but maybe the best remedy is by voting in different state-level politicians.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 19 points 3 months ago

Can the US please just decide if it wants to be a theocracy or not. Please can it be not.

This sudo religious fascist state, but also kind of not really, is really tiring on everyone else.

[-] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

It's written "pseudo", a prefix in old Greek meaning fake (as in pseudopod). "sudo" is a Linux command to run a command or script as another user.

[-] bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

Actually, running "pseudo [command]" causes your system to pretend to run the command.

Also, sudopods are a close relative of sauropoda, who can use their long necks to bypass read restrictions.

[-] dneaves@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately, "sauron [command]" still won't see the Jia Tan backdoor obscured in the shadows, nor the_ring.yml that you're piping to /dev/null

[-] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

A super user, specifically, hence superuser do.

[-] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Actually, sudo can be used to run a command as any other user. Superuser is merely the default when none is specified.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

Oh the not really part is getting removed in November if the maga party gets in the white house

[-] FarFarAway@startrek.website 15 points 3 months ago

Reminds me of the county in Florida that sends police to your door daily if they dont like you, or your family.

[-] RandomGuy79@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Buh buh buh what happened to letting the people choose

Power to the states, not their people.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
505 points (98.1% liked)

News

23600 readers
3456 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS