183

I know it's been getting worse over time, but I could still find what I needed after some digging.

Recently it's been like 10 minutes of adjusting search terms, still getting completely useless or irrelevant results, and me just giving up afterwards. Other search engines seem just as bad.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee 116 points 2 days ago

*years? Yes. It used to be the bleeding edge of search and now it's just profit driven enshittification like the rest of ai-ridden garbage tech wallstreet bullshit.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Don't forget your glue on your pizza! Can't have a pizza without glue....

[-] Nikls94@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It’s not just glue it‘s Elmer‘s Glue. They still have some standard.

Elmer can go Fudd himself. Store brand non-toxic craft paste is just as flavorful an half the price.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

It has definitely been getting worse over years, but I specifically meant the last couple of weeks. I could still find what I needed between all the garbage.. now I can't even find it after adjusting the search multiple times.

[-] Linnce@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

The other day I asked google what season we were in. The AI got it wrong, and that's like the simplest question ever.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 54 points 2 days ago

If you use Firefox you can add a Search Engine that removes the google cruft.

In about:config browser.urlbar.update2.engineAliasRefresh Boolean, hit the plus sign to add. Exit out of that screen. Then go to Search engines in Settings and “Add” [ whatever name you want to call it ] as a new search engine. And paste this URL and save it. https://www.google.com/search?q=%s&udm=14

You will see that it deletes everything but search when you use it. You can also just use the url but you must replace the %s with your search term, like red+espresso. Example: https://www.google.com/search?q=red+espresso&udm=14

I'm sure this works for other browsers, I just use Firefox.

[-] TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago

Ooo I haven't heard of this, thank you! The amount of garbage they've added is absurd.

[-] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I love you.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I've already added a new search engine like this, but what does the about:config setting do?

[-] projectmoon@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Returns the add custom search engine button. Which for some reason, has been hidden by default.

[-] Shortstack@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago

Oh my god, thank you for this. You solved a year long sufferfest for this internet stranger because of that greyed out button. Every god-damned guide online points you towards that button and I could not find the solution for it. What the fuck Mozilla

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

If you're going to use it as a one-off, you can put the udm part first, making it much easier to type into:

https://www.google.com/search?udm=14&q=

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

I was honestly getting so frustrated the other day at work when searching for something very specific and coming up empty handed. Tried DuckDuckGo and even fucking Bing and found what I needed in a matter of seconds. Google search is trash now. I have to go to the second page or further just to find something that isn't an ad, AI response, or reddit. None of which are helpful.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

DuckDuckGo is just Bing with a duck on it.

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Regardless, I still got better results than Google.

[-] TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago

I've been swapping around search engines too, but they still seem bad. I always end up back at Google just because I know how to manipulate the search terms better.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The results are usually the most clicked, not necessarily the factual links. Others have recommended kagi. I haven’t tried it yet. I remember when the internet started and you had to use them all!

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'll have to try kagi some time

EDIT: subscription based... Idk, definite maybe on that one.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Is that the one that costs money? You can't have a true incognito search if that's the case.

[-] ironsoap@lemmy.one 8 points 2 days ago

True, but worth reading their about page and privacy page. Not saying it'll stay this way, but the way they are running is something that makes more sense then being sold as a product to Google. And you aren't getting much of an incognito these days with all the fingerprinting they are doing.

I will admit kagi search isn't the highest performer, but it's viable. DDG, Start page, etc. Might give you more privacy, or not (hard to tell with DDG these days), but it might be worth trying a different model for a while.

I miss the days when the internet was truly free, but in lieu of that we have to have something better. Kagi is a start.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Incognito is on your client side browser in that the browser doesn't retain any trace of the current session once you close the tab. The search engine still knows what you whacked off to.

[-] Steve@communick.news 5 points 2 days ago

You can't have? Or you can't be sure?
Because you certainly can have. Just because you pay, doesn't mean they will log your searches. In fact Kagi claim they don't. And since their only income comes from paying users. If anyone ever found out they're lying about that, they'd quickly loose a big chink of subscribers and income. As well as get sued for fraud. So it's rather unlikely they do.

Unlike every other search provider, Kagi is the only one with a business model that ensures it's users are the customer, not the product. When actually using it every day, that's quite obvious in the results. Even when you search for a company directly, it's Wikipedia entry is usually the first result. The the company site is the second.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

True Incognito mode is a myth, it only stops keeping a history in the tab of that browser. Everytime you use a browser to go to any site ever, the browser logs you went there. So does your ISP and the site your connecting to. No matter which mode or browser you use, if you go to Google, then Google knows you went there and logs your searches.

The closest you can come to browsing the web anonymously would be with a mix of dedicated privacy OS like Tails and either a VPN or Tor as a middile man, but that assumes those proxys are not corrupted. Free VPNs make money by selling your "secret browsing" habits.

The internet is nothing more than wires, if you connect your wire to someone elses, every intermediatary knows.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] db2@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Not if you used Dogpile. Also it still exists somehow.

[-] TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

I've used Kagi's free trial. I'd turn to it when nothing else was helping and it did really well, but recently it hasn't been helping either. It's probably still fine for most things, but I'm often searching niche developer/programming things that are too burried under SEO/AI spam to find anymore.

[-] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

I recommend Kagi, I've been using it for about six months now and results - especially small web results like blogs - are so much better. I also have a pretty good time image searching compared to when I was on Google.

Yes it's paid, but that to me is the price of resisting enshittification. Find a company that isn't a publicly traded for-profit world-burner and pay them for their service. Is the idea of paying for email and search an alien concept to me? Yes. But I'm either paying Google whatever €120 a year in eyeballs on ads and an increasingly worse experience, or I'm paying €80 a year and getting a markedly better experience.

Now it's up to Kagi and Proton to not turn into shitty companies while other competitors catch up and we have a thriving ecosystem again.

[-] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Kagi is amazing. I absolutely love its' filtering features and I use that forums toggle all the time. It feels like such a more relevant experience for me. I tried it out with the 300 searches limit, but that wasn't even close to enough, turns out I easily use 4 times that in a month and even though it's not cheap it feels like it's worth it.

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

SEO became too well known and is now filled with bullshit.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I stopped using it last year it got so bad, I ended up using DDG but that’s gotten shit and I’ve found myself back on Google. To me it feels 10% better than it was when I stopped.

Although everyone’s experiences with Google are so different we’re probably all being A/B tested.

[-] tobyond@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Google Maps is utter crap lately too. It seems to be making up locations, and several times in the past month, it’s taken me to the wrong place. It’s getting almost as bad as Apple Maps

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

My favorite one recently is constantly telling me to keep straight to remain on a highway like 7 times before I need to actually get off the highway. Glad I turned off the sound a long time ago otherwise I would have lost my fucking mind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mayo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I went to a low data plan and learned that Google Maps consumes a vast amount of data (relative to my plan limit), and I download all my maps and had location off. 1 single bus route between two pinned locations was 30Mb. Maps and search could be so simple but they are insanely bloated.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago

yes. use any of the following, in no particular order:

  • ecosia.org - A non-profit certified B corp that plants trees by serving ads in your search results. Bing search underneath.
  • duckduckgo.com - A privacy friendly search engine. Primarily sourced from Bing but mixes in a few other sources.
  • any SearXNG instance - A self-hostable search front-end to various search engines.
  • marginalia.nu - specifically 'random' - An independent DIY search engine that focuses on non-commercial content, and attempts to show you sites you perhaps weren't aware of in favor of the sort of sites you probably already knew existed.
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] can@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

Yeah, last month I finally had enough and DDG has been alright

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

The problem with DDG is if it doesn't find results it just ignores your search terms and throws whatever shit it wants at you.

[-] Quik@infosec.pub 9 points 2 days ago

Oh my god, I feel this so much… Also, I think that recently got even worse, as I recently found myself switching between DDG/Google and finding both extremely bad for my query

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 2 days ago

Yes!

It think it got suddenly so much worse recently. Glad to see I’m not alone, something must’ve e changed.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

google does this as well, unless you switch on verbatim mode

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago

They fucked it all up with that AI bullshit awhile ago and it hasn’t recovered. I use start page now and am much happier.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

It's crap.

You can use udm14.org though.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

It is half okay, but only if they are not getting paid to screw up your results. It is a coup against democracy where freedom of information is freedom of the press and is an entire fundamental pillar of democracy. Google's entire business model has always been neo feudalism. A web crawler and search engine is like a library, it must be neutral, objective, and publicly funded as a non profit. Much the same with YT, it is our digital public commons and the most efficient form for information sharing in the primary form of human communication.

[-] souperk@reddthat.com 7 points 2 days ago

I have fully switched to kagi, it's not perfect but for the average case it's better than google.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I read on here (I think) a couple months ago that adding "before:2023" to your search terms improves results a lot. I've found it to be true. Unless I'm looking for something specifically from the last couple years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

i've been manually curating your search results the past few weeks. Sorry boss, i'll do better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago
[-] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 2 days ago

Lmao. Don't kid yourself, a vast majority do. Id bet 80-90%

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

This is what I call the linux bubble. People who use linux and are used to alternate solutions, which may offer better performance than the norm. Then they surround themselves with other like minded people. So much so that they begin to forget that they are using alternatives rather than the norm. Despite what benefits they gain from alternatives, some people can't grasp that they are, in fact, alternatives.

Twitter has 368 million monthly users. I find it to be a cesspool of hate, racism, and right wing agenda.

So you would think mastodon or bluesky would have equal or better numbers.

Bluesky has 9.7 million monthly users, which includes a huge recent boost because of brazil ceasing twitters ability to operate. I think that alone was 2 million users.

And mastodon has 975,000 monthly users.

So yes, despite it's flaws, twitter is still the default in microblogging. By a LOT. But I'm sure the feeling around here is "who still uses twitter???".

Everybody. Same way everybody uses google. Same way everybody uses instagram. And it's not even close to being close.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Those poor bastards

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Probably 99%. This question was only meant to be taken as "I am above the common pleb, those idiots"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
183 points (96.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35306 readers
752 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS