150
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A government shutdown would harm military readiness and have “huge, profound impacts across the globe,” Pentagon spokesperson Sabrina Singh said Tuesday morning.

With a looming government shutdown, over 1 million military members and furloughed civilian employees are at risk of going without pay during the shutdown period, Singh said on CNN, adding that a shutdown would send a dangerous message to Washington’s adversaries.

“If the U.S. government shuts down, China, Russia, North Korea, Iran — these are countries that are not shutting down, that are continuing their operations,” she said. “Any type of shutdown, any type of impact to our military and readiness, has huge, profound impacts across the globe.”

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

This makes sense when you consider the fact that republicans will do anything to strengthen our foreign adversaries.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 year ago

Republicans love the military industrial complex. Actual military members though, not so much.

[-] eee@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, like filibusters, government shutdowns are a Pandora's box. Once they've been used as a negotiating tactic once, you can never un-use them.

That's not to say this isn't despicable, but unless there's bipartisan support to change the process, we're going to see government shutdowns every time there's disagreement over funding.

[-] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

Did we learn nothing from the Wagner Group? Pay your fucking mercenaries

[-] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Those responsible would expect a revolt to be in their favour. Plus they'd be instigating it.

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Military is well funded. Too bad they can shift funds around, as they have enough.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

How and why would the government shut down?

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Short answer: the government needs funding to operate, and the Republicans are blocking already agreed-to appropriations to make a statement.

Shorter answer: domestic terrorism*

*yep, I said it

[-] Zhao@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

That wasn't a bold statement lol they are terrorists.

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It was even on the banner at CPAC! I don't know why I demure, but here we are.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
150 points (99.3% liked)

News

23267 readers
3023 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS