37
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

The pre-written letter, addressed to "The World", appears to pre-empt a failed assassination attempt. "I tried my best and gave it all the gumption I could muster," it reads.

Was it foreshadowing or had he possibly tried getting close enough before and it didn't pan out?

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Ok, I’ve read about couple articles about this letter now. All of them have the same information, and all are lacking the same information.

So this guy drops off a box at someone’s house, with a note talking about how he failed to assassinate Trump. The person with the box opens it up when this guy hits the news, arrested for the assassination attempt.

Did this guy expect to fail? Why was there only a note detailing his failed attempt, and not another one in the case he was successful?

Was he just hoping this someone with the box would go through it when he was on the news?

My gut is telling me that if there was only a failure note this whole thing was either a sham, or the person with the box knew something was going down and threw out the letter for the scenario that didn’t play out. I feel like an insane conspiracy nut job thinking like this though, but this is weird right? What kind of person who has such conviction of belief that they’re willing to kill a person goes in to it expecting to fail?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago

Our nations Mental Health Crises and ease of access to military-grade adjacent firearms are two glaring daily issues half the nation will do anything to prevent addressing. Fairly surreal.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

But at the same time...

"MeNtAL hEaLtHcArE iS fOr SnOwFLaKeS!!1! AnD tHE OnLy WaY tO bEAt a BaD gUy WitH a GuN iS a GoOd GuY WiTh a GuN!!1!" -Mentally-ill right-wing gun nuts everywhere

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Pity he let his dreams be dreams

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world -5 points 4 hours ago

You'd think Iran could hire someone more competent.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 5 hours ago

BBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for BBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c89ly20vvgvo
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
37 points (95.1% liked)

politics

18909 readers
3380 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS