116
submitted 1 month ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 60 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure nobody loves cheap Chinese goods. It's more people love to be able to afford eating, having a roof over their head, and maybe some shitty, but cheap, headphones.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Hello, fellow citizen! Nice to see you. Are you well? How is the wife/husband/partner/thruple/keyboard today? Ha. Ha. 😶

[-] klemptor@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah and also, sometimes it's really hard to find NMIC products.

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 month ago

I don't love em...I just have no damn choice because greed always wins

[-] b3an@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Many times I’ve wanted products. Could see it comes from Asia and don’t want to risk the quality. It’s flooded online. Difficult to find a true seller and one that isn’t just reselling that same shit I’m avoiding. It’s so irritating.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 45 points 1 month ago

Oh no I love my RUXIBTAN earbuds and my HURQIO keyboard.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

That particular strain of nonsense is actually specifically an Amazon thing, because you cannot sell "non branded" merchandise on Amazon, a policy that's in place allegedly to combat generic whitebox goods from flooding the site. Your product has to be sold under a registered trademark, but the loophole is that said trademark does not actually have to make any sense whatsoever.

Now there are brokers who will assist anyone in registering a trademark that is literally just a random string of letters for this express purpose. All you have to do is concoct a combination that no one has used yet, and register it with the USPTO.

Therefore the entire scheme falls flat on its face, and manifestly fails to make any impact in the problem it purports to solve. But it does probably give Amazon a legal escape hatch to accusations of being a dumping ground for Chinese knockoff products, because they can point to all those trademark registrations and say, "No, see, everything sold here is all totally from a 100% legitimate brand!"

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

1000010136 dyisland brakes

or pigeon whistle at all 1000010135

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[-] ravhall@discuss.online 31 points 1 month ago

I wasn’t aware there were alternatives not made in china.

[-] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Does this mean fewer duplicate white label items?

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

If anything it means the duplicate white label items will be harder to spot

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Fine, we'll get a bidet! TP is just way too expensive now.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

get it on temu while you still can

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

The horror.

[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Protectionism in the "land of free market" (irony)

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

There’s probably a degree of protectionism going on but these platforms sell unsafe products

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

these platforms sell unsafe products

Which is something that can, and often does happen in unregulated free markets. The invisible hand is not necessarily very good at things like consumer protection, among other things.

[-] ilmagico@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If that was the issue, they'd take steps to ensure safety, ask for certifications, etc. rather than more tariffs and lower "de minimis" exemption. Clearly these decisions are made for economic reasons, not to ensure higher quality products and protect consumers.

[-] devilish666@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Although chinese goods are famous for crappy short lifespan products but in the end we loved it because no one in this god green earth (except china) can make something cheaper & sell it at ridiculously cheaper....only china can do that thing.

I say this not to mean I am defending them, I hate that many products on the market today seem cheap because they flood the market with very cheap stuff. Yes... even though in the end we as consumers find it difficult to distinguish which goods are premium and which are crap.

We should learn from them, if they can do it, why can't we?

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Cracking down" is among the worst newpaper propaganda phrases.

It's meaningless and it implicitly justifies the "cracker".

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I’m curious what definition of “cracker” are you using?

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
116 points (94.6% liked)

News

23311 readers
3673 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS