287
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The Supreme Court is returning to a new term to take up some familiar topics — guns and abortion — and concerns about ethics swirling around the justices.

The year also will have a heavy focus on social media and how free speech protections apply online. A big unknown is whether the court will be asked to weigh in on any aspect of the criminal cases against former President Donald Trump and others or efforts in some states to keep the Republican off the 2024 presidential ballot because of his role in trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election that he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

Lower-profile but vitally important, several cases in the term that begins Monday ask the justices to constrict the power of regulatory agencies.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unconsciousvoidling@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

The religious tribunal has decreed … more babies … and more guns!!!

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Seems like a problem that fixes itself.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Nah, it just results in the children of conservatives killing loads and loads of leftists before they take themselves out to not face any consequences.

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know any leftists that are any less well armed, and staunchly pro gun ownership than at least the moderate right. Socialism and an armed populace go hand in hand. We're pro-choice AF though.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

So about abortion being a states rights matter? That was just a joke, huh?

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

it’s up to the states, but only a select few states like florida and texas.

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 year ago

The Supreme Joke, more like it.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago
[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Balance the court. It's already been packed by McConnell starting in Obama's second term. It should just be tied to the number of federal appellate courts.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honest suggestion: let's eliminate the court's fixed size requirement, and simply add a permanent justice in the third year of every presidential term.

If the total number of justices falls below 7 at any time during a president's term, the president may make one additional permanent appointment per term. Permanent appointments must be confirmed by the senate.

After making that second permanent appointment, the president may make temporary appointments to bring the total to 7. For these temporary appointments, the president may elevate any previously confirmed circuit court judge directly to the supreme court without additional confirmation. Any other nominee must receive Senate confirmation.

Any temporary appointment expires in the third year of the following presidential term.

[-] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is great. Let’s fucking goooooo

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

This illegitimate court needs to be aborted.

[-] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

213th trimester abortions?

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

Wow, the definitely not far right supreme court sure does have an unbiased and non political agenda.

Well that’s not good. sigh

[-] SynAcker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

At a minimum, the number of judges should at least match the number of federal districts we have

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

Here’s hoping they do the right thing…

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 29 points 1 year ago

They'll do the right thing, al-right...

[-] Gray@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Everything is all right with this Supreme Court.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Nope this is the year they dismantle everything just in time for Trump to overthrow our government. We need to impeach and remove all traitors from our government. When do we say enough is enough and bring out the Guillotines, Pitchforks, and Torches?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

We aren't organized enough to act before it's too late 😞

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah hard to do that when almost half the country is begging for the dictatorship and loving the boot on their neck.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

That still leaves more than half that don't.

Yet there don't seem to be organizations seriously preparing for the end of democracy.

I suspect it's because anyone that was serious would be infiltrated by law enforcement.

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

The US has withstood vastly harder times than this. We are hardly at the 'end of democracy'.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It's not the 1800s anymore, everything happens a lot faster these days.

And going from "contested election" to "civil war" wouldn't take long at all.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Almost did on January six

[-] Maeve@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago
[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I’m holding my breath /s

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
287 points (99.0% liked)

News

23259 readers
3093 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS