Germany: Far-right AfD moves to expel 'Saxonian Separatist' militants (www.dw.com)

submitted 5 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Summary

Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party announced it is expelling three members linked to the "Saxonian Separatists," a militant group aiming to establish a Nazi-inspired state in eastern Germany.

The group, believed to consist of 15-20 individuals, planned to exploit societal collapse to seize control of areas in Saxony, with intentions of enforcing ethnic cleansing. Police recently arrested eight suspected members in coordinated raids.

all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

I love it. "You can be Nazis, but you have to do it at home."

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago

There has been an even worse version of it. Kalbitz was kicked out of the Party because he lied about his "former" connection to neo-nazi groups when he joined the party. Höcke just admitted them, so he could stay.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

So not just, "you can be Nazis, but you have to do it at home," but also, "you can hang out with the other Nazis as long as they're our Nazis."

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 8 points 5 days ago

More like "its okay to be a Nazi if you are honest about it and you don't currently plan to overthrow democracy before we are ready."

[-] slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That's Landolf Ladig umm Mister Höcke for you.

Edit: I just realized that might need some explanation: https://jurios-de.translate.goog/2021/06/16/wer-ist-landolf-ladig-afd-landeschef-bjoern-hoecke-verklagt/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp

[-] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

Aren't the AfD basically neo-Nazis?

[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Pretty much. Which is why they just threw these guys out after police came down on their group, out of fear they may be banned for supporting terrorists and people would see them for what they are before it is too late

[-] slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

After all, who is better at whitewashing than Nazis?

[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago

For getting caught. Not for being Nazi terrorists.

[-] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Are you guys okay over there. It seems like half of you guys are pro Putin fascists and the other half is selling out the rest.

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

We're not.

But then, who is, these days?

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024

64 points (98.5% liked)

World News

39000 readers

2333 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.