480
Not my problem sort (infosec.pub)
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 2 hours ago

The most beautiful thing about this program is that it would work.

Various bit flips will once lead to all numbers being in the correct order. No guarantee the numbers will be the same, though...

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 points 10 minutes ago

Might also take a very long time (or a large amount of radiation).

[-] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

Hello programmers...

I recently took a course that went through basic python, C, and C++.

I had a hard time implementing various forms of sorting functions by hand (these were exercises for exam study). Are there any resources you folks would recommend so that I can build a better grasp of sorting implementations and efficiency?

[-] 90s_hacker@reddthat.com 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Skiena's Algorithm design manual is very widely recommended for learning algorithms, I've also heard good things about A common sense guide to algorithms and data structures. Skiena's also has video lectures on YouTube if you prefer videos.

From what I've seen, a common sense guide seems to be more geared towards newer programmers while Skiena assumes more experience. Consequently, Skiena goes into more depth while A common sense guide seems to be more focused on what you specifically asked for. algorithm design manual

A common sense guide

[-] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Thank you, awesome! I will definitely check out this material :)

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)
import yhwh  

def interventionSort(unsortedList):
    sortedList = yhwh.pray(
    "Oh great and merciful Lord above, let thine glory shine upon yonder list!", 
    unsortedList
    )  
    return sortedList
[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Camelcase in python, ew, a fundamentalist would do that

[-] BluesF@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

yhwh looking suspiciously like an LLM

[-] fluckx@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago

I prefer the one where you randomly sorting the array until all elements are in order. ( Bogosort )

[-] 1boiledpotato@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago

And the time complexity is only O(1)

[-] voldage@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

I don't think you can check if array of n elements is sorted in O(1), if you skip the check though and just assume it is sorted now (have faith), then the time would be constant, depending on how long you're willing to wait until the miracle happens. As long as MTM (Mean Time to Miracle) is constant, the faithfull miracle sort has O(1) time complexity, even if MTM is infinite. Faithless miracle sort has at best the complexity of the algorithm that checks if the array is sorted.

Technically you can to down to O(0) if you assume all array are always sorted.

[-] 1boiledpotato@sh.itjust.works 1 points 47 minutes ago

Oh yeah, I didn't think about the time that it takes to check if it's sorted. The sorting time is constant though

My favorite is StalinSort. You go through the list and eliminate all elements which are not in line.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 42 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

you should post this on lemmy.ml

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

it would be a pretty funny post for the full 5 minutes it would last until it got stalin sorted out of lemmy.ml

[-] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 17 points 6 hours ago
[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 28 points 6 hours ago

I hear, it actually significantly increases the chance of the miracle occurring when you pass the array into multiple threads. It's a very mysterious algorithm.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 21 points 7 hours ago

This is the algoritm I use at work.

[-] BatmanAoD@programming.dev 114 points 11 hours ago

Reminds me of quantum-bogosort: randomize the list; check if it is sorted. If it is, you're done; otherwise, destroy this universe.

[-] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 5 hours ago

The creation and destruction of universes is left as an exercise to the reader

[-] random72guy@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago

Instead of destroying the universe, can we destroy prior, failed shuffle/check iterations to retain o(1)? Then we wouldn't have to reload all of creation into RAM.

[-] BatmanAoD@programming.dev 4 points 6 hours ago

Delete prior iterations of the loop in the same timeline? I'm not sure there's anything in quantum mechanics to permit that...

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 75 points 11 hours ago

Guaranteed to sort the list in nearly instantaneous time and with absolutely no downsides that are capable of objecting.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 38 points 10 hours ago

You still have to check that it's sorted, which is O(n).

We'll also assume that destroying the universe takes constant time.

[-] Benjaben@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

We'll also assume that destroying the universe takes constant time.

Well yeah just delete the pointer to it!

[-] BatmanAoD@programming.dev 28 points 9 hours ago

In the universe where the list is sorted, it doesn't actually matter how long the destruction takes!

[-] groet@feddit.org 6 points 5 hours ago

It actually takes a few trillion years but its fine because we just stop considering the "failed" universes because they will be gone soon™ anyway.

[-] MBM 3 points 3 hours ago

Eh, trillion is a constant

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 8 points 9 hours ago

amortized O(0)

[-] vithigar@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 hours ago

Except you missed a bug in the "check if it's sorted" code and it ends up destroying every universe.

[-] db2@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

There's a bug in it now, that's why we're still here.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 hours ago

What library are you using for that?

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 7 hours ago

In Python you just use

import destroy_universe
[-] jcg@halubilo.social 23 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

is-sorted and a handful of about 300 other npm packages. Cloning the repo and installing takes about 16 hours but after that you're pretty much good for the rest of eternity

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 hours ago

that explains why it took god 7 days to make the universe

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

We still suffer from the runtime errors that could've been caught at compilation time.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 10 hours ago

Since randomizing the list increases entropy, it could theoretically make your cpu cooler just before it destroys the universe.

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 43 points 11 hours ago
[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 26 points 10 hours ago
// portability

Gave me the giggles. I've helped maintain systems where this portable solution would have left everyone better off.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 34 points 11 hours ago
[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

I wonder how many 2 item lists have been sorted that way IRL.

[-] aeharding@vger.social 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Shameless plug for my sort lib

edit: Looking at my old code it might be time to add typescript, es6 and promises to make it ✨  p r o d u c t i o n   r e a d y  ✨

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
480 points (98.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

19488 readers
856 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS