144
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 39 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I expect him to be a bloody tyrant. And why wouldn't he? He said he would and we elected him. If we had a problem with it we wouldn't have voted for him.

As long as he hurts the right people this time, he might be remembered as one of the most popular presidents in history.

I'm not sure how much longer history is going to last, is the problem.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 20 points 4 days ago

It's kind of cute for the times to write an article scaring us about that man now, after they spent months and years down playing the risk. But it's to be expected, because all they want is drama. Truth, justice, decent human beings, none of that matters to the bosses at the times.

[-] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 days ago

I expect he’ll do what he spent his last term doing; spend half the day watching Fox News and rage-tweeting, go downstairs for some photo-ops and sign whatever his staff puts in front of him, get whatever it was challenged and (sometimes) blocked in court, and then, if he’s feeling insufficient attention, make a bunch of pronouncements that’ll catch everyone by surprise and then never follow up on it.

[-] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

...And sign whatever bullshit the Federalist Society slip under his greasy hands, fucking the country over for decades, if not permanently

[-] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

You’re right, completely glossed over his 3-day golf weekends.

[-] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 days ago

This is bullshit, you made no mention of golf anywhere.

[-] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 27 points 5 days ago

Given the opportunity, no, he's not going to prosecute his foes. He's going to have them killed.

But until he can count on getting away with that, he'll have to, and will, settle for just prosecuting them.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago
[-] WatDabney@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Whatever. It doesn't matter.

The basis upon which the Supreme Court will rule in his favor as necessary might be of some scholarly interest, but that they're going to is already a given.

I think it's more likely that he'll order killings the same way that his hero Putin does - it won't be officially acknowledged in any way, but it will be an open secret that he ordered them. And anyone who tries to look into any of them any further will be silenced.

[-] TriPolarBearz@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Merriam-Webster 2025 word of the year: defenstration

Specifically, official acts + presidential pardons

[-] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Trump has to be immured. Why?

'Before Nelson Mandela was arrested in 1962, he was an angry, relatively young man. He founded the ANC's military wing. When he was released, he surprised everyone because he was talking about reconciliation and forgiveness and not about revenge.'

  • Desmond Tutu
[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

I read stuff like this and I'm like "Oh yeah, I gotta reconnect my VPN..."

As if my half-assed security measures are gonna stop anything.

[-] Tyrangle@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

But first I think he's going to pardon Hunter Biden. He'll get to look like he's rising above politics (despite Hunter not being a political figure) while painting Democrats as hypocrites for prosecuting their political rivals. Then he'll pardon anyone associated with January 6th, using the Biden pardon as cover. Then, once he's proven all the fascist rhetoric wrong, he'll seek his revenge.

[-] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago

If Joe doesn't pardon Hunter, there's no way Trump will. He's spent 6+ years saying the Biden family is crooked, he wouldn't want to show he's weak and reverse his original unsubstantiated stance. I assume Joe won't pardon Hunter, to set some sort of norm for Trump, which Trump will completely ignore and pardon his family at the first smell of corruption.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

He'd execute Hunter before pardoning him. Unless Hunter or J6ers are willing to cough up enough dough to buy a pardon, they're gonna get ignored and rot in a cell. Maybe Epstein themselves.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Get Epsteined ~~themselves~~

FTFY

I will never believe that was actually suicide. He had way too much dirt on way too many powerful people. He was offed.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
144 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3323 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS