241
submitted 10 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Police in Berwyn, Illinois, responded to an altercation involving white nationalist Nick Fuentes and Marla Rose, a woman who reportedly confronted him at his home after his address was doxxed.

Rose claims Fuentes sprayed her with a liquid, took her phone, and pushed her. She posted and later deleted a video of the incident and has since faced online harassment, including “swatting.”

Both Rose and Fuentes are currently refusing to cooperate with police, leaving the investigation stalled.

Fuentes and far-right commentators defended his actions, citing self-defense.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lakemalcom10@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago

I don't understand anyone here who says this lady is in the wrong. If he felt threatened or whatever then don't answer the door? Call the police? Instead he opens the door to attack. People saying "oh that was dumb she was asking for it", wow no.

[-] zarp86@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 minutes ago

It is possible for two people in a situation to both make poor decisions.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago

I still don't understand the supposed tough guys that back this whiney little brat who cannot even get laid, all while labeling everyone and everything they don't like a "cuck".

Also, the same bunch looooove a whiney little brat born with a silver spoon in his mouth, never worked a day in his life, never was in the military, and spends two hours on hair and makeup every day....

I mean, what the actual fuck?

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 33 points 6 hours ago

No such thing a self-defense for a walking rape threat.

Little bitey chihuahua trying to look tough.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 hours ago

This take is dumb...

I'm all for finding these people where they live but she went there alone and seems to have had a dumb plan. She didn't think she may confronted or possibly assaulted? And hey, the guy may have been within his rights

I hope more people show up next time, with a better plan

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

"Your house, my choice." while everyone takes turns taking a hot steamy dump on his doorstep?

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm here for it!

[-] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 59 points 9 hours ago

And we're going to have a handful of these kind of cases in four years. Trump will pardon people like Nick and fucking christ I hate this timeline.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Pardon doesn't make his house go away.

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago
[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

Nick is a white supremacist fascist asshole, but I'm not aware of him doing anything illegal that requires a pardon. Unless I missed something?

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 hours ago

No, he's just a sad excuse for a sack of shit, let alone a human being. He's talked openly about wanting a child bride, amongst other despicable crap that's oozed out of the hole he calls a mouth.

I appaude this woman and any others that come for him and his ilk. Fuck Nick Fuentes.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 15 points 9 hours ago

Not unless he has no trespassing signs up. Even then, I think it's still legal to knock on someone's door.

[-] RavenFellBlade@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 hours ago

How long do you think before he just vanishes?

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm honestly surprised it's taking this long. I was expecting same-day justice, delivered straight to his face.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm surprised the altercation wasn't just a woman assassinating him

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 9 hours ago

I am confused as to why Rose would not cooperate with police. It's certainly her right, but I don't understand the choice. Maybe it's "Oh fuck I did not want this attention, just go away"?

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 hours ago

Why would you expect the police to come down on Rose's side of things? They are much more likely to side with the Neo-Nazis, based on history.

[-] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 49 points 9 hours ago

Non-zero chance there's lots of Fuentes fans amongst that group. She's probably already getting a bunch of death threats virtually, why would you want that in person as well. Especially when you know that as things are dragged out through the legal system it's not going to end up mattering anyway because that flavor of person doesn't appear to have legal culpability for anything.

Doesn't bode well for the future.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, in general I am not hearing nearly enough about the high numbers of MAGA people in the police and the military. I'm not sure most folks have considered the gravity of that tendency.

I have seen arguments like "well let's see Trump try X or Y; I'm sure the military would step in". But like, what? If the military steps in it certainly won't be to stop Trump. Quite the opposite.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Military actually leaned Biden in 2020:

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2020/08/31/as-trumps-popularity-slips-in-latest-military-times-poll-more-troops-say-theyll-vote-for-biden/

Not sure how things stand in 2024 but I can't imagine Trump shitting on a bunch of generals who called him a fascist would help much.

Military veterans seem to support Trump more though, not sure why specifically. And lots of vets in the police. So that might be a different story.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 hour ago

I'd argue he is aware of this, though, which is probably why he is looking towards purging various groups of ideological mismatches.

[-] growsomethinggood@reddthat.com 17 points 9 hours ago

Can you imagine the slander she'd receive on a national level if this went to trial in the next few years? It could be legitimately dangerous to her safety, even if she was found to be completely in the right.

[-] Shapillon@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago

Well, she already got swatted.

[-] growsomethinggood@reddthat.com 10 points 9 hours ago

Exactly, I don't blame her for not wanting to escalate on that

[-] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Watch "Don't Talk to the Police"

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 10 points 9 hours ago
[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

Rumors he also really likes manly men

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Oh wow I didn't know he was still alive. That's great.

[-] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world -5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I dont think either of these people are in the right.

Why would you go to this guys home and knock on the door? By yourself? What’s the expected outcome that will happen?

I can’t think of any realistic positive outcome for either party.

They both win stupid prizes

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz -3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yeah, doing that alone is incredibly stupid. She's probably luck not to have been shot.

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
241 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3666 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS