242
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by qualeyj@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.world

Yes, I know that the ranking is not a good metric of real world use.

Just posting this because MX Linux has been in the number one spot for a long time (2 years perhaps?) and it's surprising to see some other distro on the top of their site.

https://distrowatch.com/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 133 points 3 weeks ago

MX Linux, the king of asking 'what's Mx linux' and inadvertently fueling its growth in distrowatch

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 43 points 3 weeks ago

Save me the trouble, what is it?

[-] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 37 points 3 weeks ago

Just think of it as Ubuntu with wm and no bloat

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 33 points 3 weeks ago

It's Debian with customizations, as well as some custom GUI programs for managing the system.

https://mxlinux.org/

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago

Look it up on distrowatch

[-] OR3X@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

Motocross Linux

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lancalot@discuss.online 18 points 3 weeks ago

I wonder how long it will take before it will drop off the top 10.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Somewhere between 10000 years and 5 minutes

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee 49 points 3 weeks ago

Funny never heard of mx linux

[-] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 3 weeks ago

No one has until they look at distro watch /j

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 13 points 3 weeks ago

You say that as a joke, but that is exactly how I figured out it exists.

[-] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago

I really don't think the /j is necessary.

[-] Caboose12000@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

ive been into linux for a year and a half and ive never hears of MX linux until today

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

I've been into Linux for like twenty years and used probably ten or fifteen distros and never heard of it

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's funny and awesome that the two top distro are Ubuntu remixes that remove snap.

Edit: I'm wrong. MX uses Debian as upstream, not Ubuntu, which removes any snap related tech from the picture entirely.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 11 points 3 weeks ago

IMO Ubuntu without Snap, but with a default Gnome or KDE (and a visual DE selector screen during installation) would be absolutely perfect.

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 5 points 3 weeks ago

What? MX Linux is a Debian remix in the style of antiX I thought?

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Shoot, you're right. I thought MX used Ubuntu as upstream but it uses Debian.

[-] devilish666@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

I really like mint although i never used it again.
Pros using mint :

  • It's easy to learn
  • It's stable
  • It's Windows XP like
  • Not recourse hogging like KDE
  • Easy to customize

Cons using mint :

  • It's debian based
[-] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 25 points 3 weeks ago

Not recourse hogging like KDE

KDE has been hogging no resources for ages now, it's really snappy even on not so powerful machines!

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

How many fucking years will we be out of KDE 4 before these yahoos figure that out?

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, unless you install some buggy stuff on top it's as snappy as xfce - tested on literally j4125 (it's GPU helps), with wobbly burning windows and everything no holdups, smol RAM usage too (especially stock).

[-] superkret@feddit.org 15 points 3 weeks ago
[-] 4grams@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

That’s what LMDE is for :)

[-] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

That's still not Debian ;)

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 10 points 3 weeks ago

Debian based is alright, I'm more against it for being based on Ubuntu. Also con: apt

Not recourse hogging like KDE

Really not that bad nowadays.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

There is an official Debian-based edition of Mint: LMDE. It's what I use.

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

yeah I run kde on my 12yo laptop and it's smooth

[-] Sunny@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

New to Linux, why is Debian based considerd a con?

[-] msage@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago

Very old packages.

They have security updates, but are usually held back years to ensure stability.

[-] Sunny@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks 👍

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Why is Debian based a problem? I ask this as my first IRL Linux user that taught me about Linux still uses Debian Unstable as his daily driver workhorse, and he is a CS Theory Doctor, and has to reboot his system once a year or so to keep it functioning properly.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Debian based is very much not a con. You want a working stable system that is easy to use. RHEL like systems can be more stable but the added overhead means a slower package manager

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr 13 points 3 weeks ago

I really don't like Mint. It feels like a discount version of Debian/Ubuntu to me. It makes it even worse that the person who introduced it to me has all the worst toxic traits. Now I can't see it as a good alternative.

[-] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It might just be a matter of perspective. I'm not very knowledgeable on distros, so my opinion may come from ignorance:

To me, Ubuntu is too resource intensive with too much going on. Mint seems relatively lean yet modern, with all the basics covered. Debian is a little sparse (no sudo, no fdisk, what's going on here?).

[-] mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr 15 points 3 weeks ago

Who told you you can't sudo on Debian? ^^ I feel like Debian is flexible enough to give you the system you might want without the bullshit. Ubuntu has lost its way last decade, but you can still debloat it mostly and use one of its alternatives. The Cinnamon DE has improved a lot, but it still feels like Windows Vista to me.

I ended up using NixOS lately so I can have the flexibility, newer packages and very clean repeatable configuration.

[-] kubica@fedia.io 3 points 3 weeks ago

I haven't seen sudo installed by default on debian. Probably the comment is about that. When you start you tend to use only what is already there to not mess things too much.

[-] rustydomino@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Sudo is installed on Debian by default, but the default user is not in the sudo group by default. This is intended behavior and is different than Ubuntu or Mint, where the default user created during install is automatically part of the sudo group.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] exu@feditown.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

In Debian, if you don't set a root password during the install your first user is added to the sudo group.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 weeks ago

It's Ubuntu without Snaps and a nice DE.

Ignore people when it comes to software. Many advocate Mint. Some are lovely, some are dicks. That goes for every distro.

[-] somenonewho@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

I've never understood the Mint hype. Like you say it seems like Ubuntu with extra steps.

I do have beefs with some of the decisions Canonical makes but if anyone asks me what distri they should start with I will always recommend Ubuntu simply because it's "the distro" if you search for "Linux" tutorials online 9 times out of 10 you will get a tutorial aimed at Ubuntu. Packages for software that isn't in repos are usually available as .deb ...

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago

It’s not really a hype. It just vibes with a lot of people.

[-] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

Someone doesn't like windows because they put ads in their start menu: aww you're sweet

Someone doesn't like Ubuntu because they put ads in their start menu: hello, human resources?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

i guess the bots that game the 'rankings' went down.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago

I cannot think of a single reason bots would be pimping MX Linux.

It's a pretty low key project. Antix gets more "noisy" than MX does, and that's not even much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] style99@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago

What's interesting is if you look at Trending past 6 months, which puts elementary firmly in 1st. EasyOS and Mint are almost tied for 2nd.

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago

IIRC, its because there is a vulnerability in some websites at https://example.com/mx so, since distrowatch has mx linux at https://distrowatch.com/mx a lot of bots will try to go to there and push its ratings up accidentally.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
242 points (96.9% liked)

Linux

8297 readers
93 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS