1028
Vroom vroom! (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jve@lemmy.world 52 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Sorry for Reddit watermark… couldn’t quickly find it elsewhere.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 41 points 21 hours ago

that is literally the worst watermark I've ever seen in my entire time on the internet, more than a quarter century now.

[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 119 points 1 day ago

That train will just keep coming. Once such a freight train is going you better get out of the way. The amount of kinetic energy that's coming towards you is dwarfing compared to a measly tank.

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

A train of 8000 tons at a velocity of 30 km/h roughly has the kinetic energy of 66.39 kg TNT.

Supposedly 100 kg TNT

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

~~I don't think your units make sense


kinetic energy has units of energy, but "kg TNT per second" is power (about 4MW). (I think just remove the "every second" and it's correct?)~~

Edit: parent edited comment.

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago

You're right, but "every second" was meant more as a display of the energy in the train, like a large explosion "every second". Is that very wrong?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 104 points 1 day ago

this sub doesn't exist on Lemmy :(
i miss r/bitchimatrain

[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago

Be the change you want to see in the world! Don’t let your dreams be dreams!

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but if you're gonna create it, you have to post to it like once a week or it'll just sit there dead, forever.

And who wants to find something to post once a week? Can't I just have Facebook feed it to me. Picture Zuck saying "here comes the plane!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 53 points 1 day ago

Sounds like it's time to create it!

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 19 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Well that's an M109 Paladin. It weighs about half as much as an actual tank. But if it was fully loaded there's a pretty good chance nobody wins because it's an artillery system and it carries a lot of stuff that goes boom.

I don't care to speculate on who wins between a 70 ton tank and a train. It probably depends on what the train is pulling.

Edit to add - also we need pictures from different angles. From this angle it looks like the Paladin might have simply been de-tracked. But I'm pretty sure there's more damage as it's armor is actually comparatively light, rated for small arms and shrapnel.

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 7 points 20 hours ago

So it's more self-propelled artillery?

[-] _bcron@midwest.social 6 points 16 hours ago

Technically yeah, colloquially no sane person would judge another for calling such a thing a tank

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

It's only a tank if it comes from the Tankeshire region of England, otherwise it's just sparkling armoured vehicle.

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago

Nah, I don't judge people for being wrong or inaccurate, particularly when the colloquial use of a term is as firmly established. Ideally, people would still know the distinction, and I'd prefer to have journalists be accurate at least, but mostly I care about knowing what's technically correct myself. I don't need to be a pedant, I just don't want to be ignorant.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

That's exactly what it is.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago

Here you go.

South Carolina in September. Low-slung trailer got stuck at the crossing and the driver skedaddled right before the impact. Also, ever so sadly, it doesn't officially count as a tank, only self-propelled artillery.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 12 points 23 hours ago

I expected more damage on the train. It really didn't give a fuck.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I think less and less damage to either side as armor and structural integrity increase is probably the norm with trains. For example non armor vehicles are turned into fun metal tangles. This 30 ton "lightly" armored vehicle looks pretty intact. A 70 ton tank might just remain more intact as the train shunts it to the side. The train might take more superstructure damage but there's a lot of just solid metal pushing in one direction. So I don't think any impact like that is ever going to actually just destroy the train.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 19 hours ago

I was wondering how a tank ended up on a railway track.

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Kinda looks like an M1A1 Abrams to me

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

That is 100 percent a pally. Abrams don't have rear doors.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Nah, it's got that extra flat butt and long overhang with the basket thing on the back of the turret. The news report also said it's a Paladin, though this video is also showing off midsize-market local American news, so I wouldn't have trusted it on its own.

tank looks like missing parts of the bottom part, train is uhh 🥭

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Just skirts and detracted, the hull is probably intact but likely cracked enough it will need refurb at the factory. Also it probably fell off the train rather than ran into it.

[-] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago

🇺🇸This is America🇺🇸

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Attention dispatch... There has been a mass shooting at the site of the Tank Train collision, but thankfully all victims have successfully had their medical claims for woundcare denied. Time to go home...

Top Gun theme blares as the Police Mustang drives off into the sunset. And... scene.

[-] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Worthy of a South Park bit

[-] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

Considering tanks are transported by train, not surprising. Train big.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

And the train I am currently on was transported by truck.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Why don't we use trains on battlefields? (I see no issues with this plan)

[-] leisesprecher@feddit.org 62 points 1 day ago

You could even wrap the tracks around the train so it can go wherever it wants!

[-] scoutFDT@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago

That's just a tank with extra steps

[-] el_abuelo@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago

No there are no steps. And even if there were the wraparound tracks would be able to go up them due to their circular nature.

[-] anzo@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago

Make a lengthier tank? Like a centipede!!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago
[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

We ironed up the boats too, steam engine warfare was kinda cool ngl

[-] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 21 hours ago
[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 21 hours ago

For those who like podcasts but want to ensure they get the right format for the podcast, go for the video version. Pure audio is fine and all but you don't get to see the slides or Justin's terrible scribblings overtop of the slides.

This podcast however is one where you can easily have the video playing while you do other things, glancing occasionally when they shift to a new slide or start drawing diagrams on the slides

[-] boywar3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Isn't that a self-propelled artillery piece? I wanna say like an M109 or something

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Paladin. The ass end of an Abrams is a jet engine not a rear hatch

[-] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago

This is for sure gta

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
1028 points (99.4% liked)

Funny

6982 readers
971 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS