-15
London Bridge (lemmy.world)
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

What the fuck? No wonder people think we are unhinged. Get this shit outta here. I just want to be able to walk to the grocery store.

[-] AnotherWorld@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago

Hey, the post has a Report button, click it, write that the post violates community rules, the moderators will remove it

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

You assume that I already didn't do that, as well as commenting.

[-] Harvey656@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

This was funny in the comics community.

Here however, it comes of quite a bit psychotic.

And in case it needs to be said: NO, blowing up a bridge with mostly innocent people is bad, mkay?

[-] haverholm@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago

It's fairly dire to assume that people in this community will read this comic and go "Oh snap! Why didn't I think about this before?"

As I just posted in another comment, my read on the comic is that the person we see in the last panel is intentionally depicted as psychotic, and not an aspirational figure... but yeah. Don't blow up people to prove a point about infrastructure.

[-] brewery@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

As someone who used to cycle, walk or ride a bus across these bridges, please don't blow them up. In fact, I think all the central London bridges have bus lanes, plenty of walking space and some have cycle lanes. Theres one bridge for people only. I know im taking this too seriously but it's a very scary thought

[-] oo1 10 points 1 day ago

The real (modern) london bridge is mostly bus lane and pedestrian traffic. 2x bus lanes, 2x wide pavements, and 2x car lanes (probably mostly taxis). I'd guess - from when i used to regularly use it 10-15 years ago, the pavements move the most people by a decent margin , especially at rush hour. I always thought they should close one of the bus lanes at rush hour to give to pedestrians.

It's not clear which bridge they're trying to draw though, normally people depict tower bridge which is way narrower. I think just 1 mixed lane in each direction - that is often a log jam of buses and cars - still fairly decent width pavements though, but no where near the rush hour (pedestrian) traffic of London bridge. Thats just because its a worse location.

Of course the nursery rhyme refers to the old medieval london bridge that was covered with houses and shops and stuff. Of corse in those days people went to Southwark for different reasons.

Maybe they're depicting the dartford crossing?

[-] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

London Bridge now has cycle lanes, too, but they're not properly connected at either end. Still, a bit of an improvement, makes it easy to admire the view as you cross!

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

So....kill hundreds of innocent people is the answer? This isn't some Luigi shit. that would just mostly people trying to get to or from work and the message here is they should all die for that?

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago

It's a dark joke about a nursery rime. It doesn't read like a call to action.

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

And if it had been in A comic group I would agree. Honestly I like this. But posting it here has implications.

[-] haverholm@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago

I think you're the only one taking the comic this literally?

The top two panels do have some !fuckcars energy, but the lower half about the bombing is about a delusional and/or haunted guy who is spurred on by a ghostly woman. Not exactly a call to action against private motorists.

[-] Novamdomum@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

"...and in other news, the forum ****cars, an internet discussion group recently classified as an extremist group has been banned. Shrimply Flibbles, the groups moderator said they would appeal the ban and that the cartoon calling for the mass killing of car drivers had not been noticed until it was too late. They said the forum was a place where genuine concerns with mass car ownership could be discussed and that extremist views like those represented in the cartoon did not reflect the opinions of the members of the group. And now the weather..."

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
-15 points (41.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9802 readers
366 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS