386
I know a solution for billionaire robber barons.
Glad to see them finally labeled Robber Barons. Because that's exactly what they are.
Oligarchs is IMO a better term for our times. Robbers Barons has an archaic sound to it.
I've also noticed defenders of corruption/oligarchs really dislike this term.
Robber barrons is nice in that it is archaic, and shows us things haven't really ever changed.
I use oligarchs in polite conversation, but it's nice to have options.
I was about to comment nearby that the phrase "billionaire robber barons" is redundant because there are no billionaires who are not living and profiting by means that should be illegitimate.
But you just reminded me that even "robber barons" is a conflicted term because it implies that there is or was some other type of more acceptable, more legitimate baron.
I suppose I'm probably playing "too socialist for school" here, but there never should have been any barons, and right now there ought not to be any billionaires. Their very existence is proof of a failed form of government.
I prefer plutocrats to oligarchs. It points out that the problem is wealth disparity, specifically
Gonna be another 100 years before anything does something.
This is key. The right vs left, culture wars, even, I suspect, focus on proxy wars -- all of it is meant to distract the people from the fact they have been bought and sold by the rich.
Rich vs everyone else is the conflict to focus. Everything else is distraction. And, what do you know? We The People have a lot in common if we start talking about wealth disparity.
Reframing is important
Yes, the issue is billionaire robber barons, AND the issue is that they are importing cheap labor to replace Americans, AND the cheap labor is suppressing wages for Americans. It's even worse than the TFW program in Canada as it applies to skilled labor that is available in the US, but more expensive.
But the cheap labour is only cheap because the robber barrons allow it to be.
Yep, they are also being abused with the added "bonus" of helping pit workers against workers instead of all workers against the super-rich.
In Australia we just made wage theft a criminal offence:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-12-30/wage-theft-crime-jail-intentional-fair-work/104758608
It's absolutely fucking flabbergasting that that hasn't always been the case, everywhere. I mean, WTF: the word "theft" is right there in the damn name!
Cool, but I doubt anyone will actually see jail time. Maybe a fall guy, at best.
There were recently a few egregious cases that were heavily fined. I suspect that if they were prosecuted with these new laws the outcome would be prison, but I'm not a lawyer and I don't pretend to be one on the Internet.
711 probably deserves it from what I've heard
ahh..
I see your society still believes in the rule of law.
I'll believe it when I see a CEO extradited to Aus for it.
Oh, but that's but a ten year long accident, nothing deliberate /s
Uh... How is it a distraction? It's the same problem
No, but you see, this issue has the far right fighting amongst themselves. We must ignore this part of the issue and focus on the big picture where the far right are united. That would be better for some reason...
Err, H1B visas are part of that system of exploitation. Maybe we should let them fued over it some more.
Pretty much yeah, the uber wealthy constantly distract from the fact that they’re not paying their fair share to society for all the benefits they get from its structure and organization
Gee, who could that be?
always has been
Soon to be trillionare
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
386 points (98.2% liked)
News
23709 readers
3692 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS