181
submitted 2 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Thousands of Facebook and Instagram ads have illegally marketed gun silencers disguised as “fuel filters,” violating U.S. federal law and Meta’s ad policies.

These devices, linked to a Chinese drop-shipping network, are sold for as little as $50 and promoted using recycled videos and stolen content.

Despite some ad removals, new campaigns quickly reappear, targeting niche audiences, including military personnel.

The ads have sparked legal, cybersecurity, and national security concerns, with critics citing Meta’s insufficient transparency and moderation tools.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 81 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If tech platforms are too large to properly police their endorsed content, then the only reasonable solution is to shut them down.

Please don't forget that advertising on these platforms could be moderated if they so chose - it simply isn't moderated for profitability reasons.

Don't allow fucks like Meta to push a narrative that they're simply unable to moderate content while making buckets full of money running a service business that doesn't even need to exist.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Right, it's not that they can't, it's that they don't want to because if they actually cut all the grift they probably wouldn't be profitable. Especially Meta, since no one gives a fuck about the Metaverse and they just had to pull their AI profiles because of bad response to them. Seriously adding fake profiles to their services because they need to pump engagement numbers, that means they're failing if they're turning to these absurd kind of tricks to keep engagement afloat. Being forced to regulate them would likely put them out of business.

Here's an example from Ed Zitron:

In 2017, the document notes that engagement metrics started to dive, but the company’s focus on “Time Spent” meant that nobody noticed because the number that Mark Zuckerberg cared about went up, until the alarm was sound and Facebook moved to “Sessions.”

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 9 points 1 day ago

100% this.

There's no cosmic law that says you must build a sprawling social network. If you can't build it safely, then don't build it.

If someone build a very profitable machine in the town square that shot out rusty nails and killed people every so often, people would shut it down. Well, hopefully.

Wait, if they can’t get huge how are we going to get our most brilliant people like Mark Zuckerberg and Peter Theil the sorts of money they need to pull the levers of power?

[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

The US statutes limiting suppressors are just plain stupid. FWIW, in many places in Europe, suppressors are MANDATORY. Yet these devices which reduce obnoxious and potentially dangerous noise are taxed and regulated heavily in the US for some reason. I can only think that the legislators who wrote these statutes are stupid and probably based their laws against suppressors on their hilariously inaccurate depiction in spy movies. Almost all suppressors reduce really really really fucking loud shooting to really loud shooting. They serve to eliminate some noise pollution. What’s not to like?

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

A lot of our legal prohibitions are largely based on what legislators see reflected in pop-culture and hollywood, because hollywood never takes creative-liberties with portrayals of reality.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Both sides are clueless but in different ways. Dems want to ban rifles that look scary (because clearly that means they shoot bullets faster or some shit) while ignoring the overwhelming majority of gun crimes are pistol related (wow amazing a gun you can fit in a pocket gets used in more crimes then one you have to sling over your back), while republicans want to let 8 year olds have AK's.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I think the idea of them being illegal is so that if you shoot someone you will be heard. That was always my understanding. If it's silent you could shoot a bunch of people before anyone realizes making it more dangerous

[-] Traister101@lemmy.today 2 points 19 hours ago

In real life suppressors make guns go from painfully loud to just very loud. You'll still be heard

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 49 points 2 days ago

I'd pretend to be outraged except I don't give a shit. They could go after the Chinese companies for continuing to sell products they know are dangerous and/or illegal in the US but so far nobody has done that.

Suppressors should probably just be an over the counter item anyway, as they are in much of Europe. They are a hearing safety device. The NFA is bullshit.

[-] Harvey656@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I don't particularly like the term Silencer. They are not silent, not even close, at least not the ones you just slap on to the end of the barrel.

They make the gun a little quieter as long as you use subsonic ammunition, quiet enough to likely not need hearing pro. Should still use that anyways, but still. These things won't make it so your 007ing or Wick in the subway.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes exactly, that’s why they ARE NOT silencers, they are suppressors

Anyone seriously throwing around the term silencer doesn’t know what they’re talking about

[-] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Either they're ignorant of them, or they are using a historically synonymous term

https://www.forgottenweapons.com/accessories/maxim-silencer/

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Honestly, I don't give a shit about silencers either, but I do care about fucking up Meta (which is fundamentally maniupulative and must be destroyed), so I'm perfectly happy for the law to come down on it like a ton of bricks.

[-] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Awesome, ill take a dozen

[-] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

I remember seeing people push these on Facebook in 2015 til I left in 2017. One of those people was making ghost guns in California and ended up being targeted by a big ATF raid, so it's not like this hasn't been a known content issue to the feds

I wish they showed pictures because they actually are fuel filters, you need a threaded adapter but once you have that you could just as easily get the right size filter from autozone and screw it on the firearm. Idk if what they're referencing came with and adapter or not because theres no pictures or mention of it.

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I know the things you're talking about, basically a thread adapter to screw an off-the shelf oil filter from auto zone or wherever onto your gun, and the first shot punched a hole through the other side.

Also those adapters are legally considered a silencer and you still have to jump through all the same hoops to get one.

That's not the thing I've been getting advertised to me on Facebook as an oil or fuel filter

The things I'm getting are a long thin metal tube with baffles inside and threads on one end that look basically like a textbook silencer/suppressor

I also see them getting advertised as "solvent traps" for gun cleaning, which I suppose is marginally better than they're advertising it for some sort of firearm use, but I know a silencer when I see one.

Also if you're using so much solvent that you have it oozing out the barrel while you're cleaning the gun and feel like you need some sort of device to contain it, that's a pretty sure sign that you're using way too much solvent.

Unless maybe you've just pulled a Soviet surplus Mosin Nagant out of a crate and need to clean 50 years of caked-on cosmoline off of the whole damn rifle. I don't think I've ever seen a mosin with a threaded barrel though.

And I can't think of any good reason that trap would have a hole at both ends, kind of seems like that defeats the stated purpose of trapping the solvent.

[-] Bad_Engineering@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago

I think you're thinking of oil filter suppressors. They do require an adapter, but the ones the article is talking about are straight up firearm suppressors, they just don't drill the hole in one end. Otherwise its a complete purpose built suppressor.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wild, do they have boosters in them and all? I'd not expect one that costs 50 bucks to tbh.

[-] Bad_Engineering@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

The $50 ones have little stamped steel baffles in them, but I've seen pricier ones with machined aluminum cores for like $120.

[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=fuel+filter+silencer&t=fpas&iax=images&ia=images

I couldn't find any on AliExpress, but you can still find the oil filter adapters.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Honesty better baffles than Id expext there, thats wild, looks like one or two has a booster or similar spring device too.

Zucc has no lower limit

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

They're still there!

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
181 points (98.9% liked)

News

23761 readers
3280 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS