228
submitted 7 hours ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nyan@lemmy.cafe 7 points 2 hours ago

Oh my, the US military might have to change the name of the list to, "Foreign companies we're blacklisting for classified reasons". How terrible.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 21 points 3 hours ago

Discovery process, you say?

[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 109 points 6 hours ago

Here's a list of websites China bans:

  • Google
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo
  • Wikipedia
  • Marxists Internet Archive
  • Reddit
  • Fandom
  • Netflix
  • Zoom
  • Blogspot
  • Bing
  • Instagram
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitch
  • Roblox
  • Steam Store
  • Steam Community
  • Spotify
  • Messenger
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Skype
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • SoundCloud
  • Signal Private Messenger
  • Dropbox
  • Pornhub
  • XVideos
  • Medium
  • Dailymotion
  • BBC
  • The New York Times
  • Vimeo
  • The Guardian
  • SlideShare
  • Discord
  • DeviantArt
  • The Washington Post
  • Nico Video
  • Archive.org (Internet Archive)
  • Bloomberg
  • Flickr
  • Wretch
  • HuffPost
  • The Wall Street Journal
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Scratch
  • Reuters
  • NBC News -TIME
  • Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)
  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)
  • Bandcamp
  • Technorati
  • Archive of Our Own
  • Viber
  • South China Morning Post
  • Plurk
  • The Economist
  • ABC
  • Voice of America
  • Radio Free Asia
  • NBC
  • PBworks
  • The Epoch Times
  • The Epoch Times (Chinese edition)
  • HBO
  • WION
  • Hong Kong Free Press
  • Apple Daily
  • TikTok
  • ChatGPT
  • Rockstar Games
  • GitHub
  • Hugging Face
  • Flipkart
  • Zomato
  • Clubhouse
  • Swiggy
  • Truth Social
  • National Weather Service
  • Kanzhongguo (English)
  • Kanzhongguo (Chinese)
  • Microsoft Copilot
  • Telegram
  • Voice of America (Chinese)
  • Teacher Li Is Not Your Teacher (by a famous anti-CCP Twitter poster)
[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 2 points 22 minutes ago

Basically any site that they don't have full control over/can't buy favor from and has the ability to spread info they dislike, even if it's something as simple as 2+2=4".

And if you're looking for someone outside of China to blame for their internet shield, Cisco was responsible for helping them set it up.

[-] coaxil@lemm.ee 13 points 3 hours ago

National weather service???

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 hours ago

(tin foil hat)

The government... They control the weather information... Satellites... Weather machines... Snorts cocaine we can't trust them we need to trust our eyes...

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

Uh ... why SCMP? Isn't that a party-friendly newspaper anyway?

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

SCMP is critical of China, but they do soften the blow

[-] Xyii@fasheng.ing 1 points 4 hours ago

The list is not entirely correct.

From china

[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago
[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Ironically.....

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 hours ago

Fair point, but that means the ban should be coming from Department of Commerce, not the DoD.

Don't try to come up with bullshit excuses about espionage.

"We're banning these private-business Chinese websites because China bans our private-business websites and that's anti-competitive".

[-] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 0 points 5 hours ago

We should have done the same

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 hours ago

Hard disagree, censorship is not welcome in a free society. I dislike a number of those sites and haven't heard of most of the rest, but I wouldn't ban a single one.

[-] kava@lemmy.world -3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yeah let's follow China's lead and become just like them! I support restricting political freedoms and a giant firewall and a social credit system too.

They are obviously the superior system and therefore we need to emulate them.

[-] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Cool, can we make the divest from American game studios now?

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 122 points 7 hours ago

Of course it’s not a military company, it’s an espionage company.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 47 points 7 hours ago
[-] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

Normally, espionage can collaborate with other branches of government, apart from the military.

[-] tragicinfo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Come at me bro

[-] _sideffect@lemmy.world 20 points 7 hours ago

Lmao, poor little babies

[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 hours ago

Keep it a note that having them listed as a Chinese military company could let US put pressure against open source groups to not collaborate with them; very similar to how US forced Linux Foundation to kick off decade old russian collaborators.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

That's a bad mischaracterization. You cannot force someone to do something voluntarily . Torvald spoke in support of it. I'm sure many governments and groups using the Linux kernel and open source want Developers that are vetted. Or can be reasonably sure won't be forced to act maliciously under duress.

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
228 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

60351 readers
4678 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS